Replies: 5 comments 3 replies
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
ideas suggestions are we correct the code or is it possible to run it? ))) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
litecoincash disabled asicboost - failed to submit block: high-hash Note to sha256d ASIC miners It was previously observed that some ASIC miners would abuse ~13 high bits of the version fields to give them extra nonce space. This will no longer be tolerated, and block versions are validated more tightly. To ensure your blocks don't get rejected, we recommend using the exact version field value that getblocktemplate gives you. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
LCC add minotaurx
https://github.com/litecoincash-project/litecoincash/releases/tag/v0.16.3
RPC / Config changes
getblockheader and getblock will now show the algo for a given pow block.
Block templates differ between MinotaurX and sha256d blocks. Therefore, the getblocktemplate RPC method accepts a new parameter, powalgo, to specify either minotaurx or sha256d:
getblocktemplate '{"powalgo":"minotaurx"}'
or
getblocktemplate '{"powalgo":"sha256d"}
use
"gbtArgs": [{"rules": [ "segwit" ]}, "minotaurx"], - gbtArgs - not used already in new version core?
"gbtArgs": [{"powalgo": [ "minotaurx" ]}], maybe? )
"blockTemplateRpcExtraParams": [ "minotaurx" ], - right?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions