Skip to content

Conversation

@qiujian16
Copy link
Member

@qiujian16 qiujian16 commented Oct 16, 2025

Summary

Related issue(s)

Fixes #

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated internal code review team assignments.

No user-facing changes in this release.

Signed-off-by: Jian Qiu <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from deads2k and mdelder October 16, 2025 08:54
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 16, 2025

Walkthrough

This update modifies the OWNERS file to add jnpacker as both an approver and reviewer, while removing mdelder from the reviewers list. No structural changes were made to the file.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
OWNERS file maintenance
OWNERS
Added jnpacker to approvers and reviewers; removed mdelder from reviewers

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description Check ⚠️ Warning The PR description consists entirely of the template scaffolding with no actual content filled in by the author. Both the "Summary" and "Related issue(s)" sections are completely empty, with only the template structure and comment blocks remaining. While the required section headings are present, the critical Summary section contains no information explaining why the OWNERS file was updated or what the specific changes accomplish. This represents a largely incomplete description that fails to provide meaningful context about the pull request.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title Check ✅ Passed The PR title "🌱 Update owner file" is directly related to the changeset, which shows updates to an OWNERS file including adding jnpacker as an approver and reviewer and removing mdelder from reviewers. The title is concise, clear, and uses the appropriate emoji from the repository guidelines (🌱 for other/misc changes). The title accurately summarizes the main change without unnecessary details or vague language.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 46de1ae and 549789c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • OWNERS (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: verify
🔇 Additional comments (1)
OWNERS (1)

4-9: GitHub user jnpacker verified and OWNERS file changes are valid.

The user jnpacker (Joshua Packer) exists. The additions to both the approvers and reviewers lists follow correct YAML syntax and are consistent with the existing format. No issues found.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Member

@mikeshng mikeshng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

/lgtm

Should probably use emeritus but can be a separate PR.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 16, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mikeshng, qiujian16

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 1114e82 into open-cluster-management-io:main Oct 16, 2025
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants