Replies: 5 comments
-
@monkeycc, can you add a bit more context please? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Sorry , Re edit completed |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
To understand why your pixel f1 is so low,we need to have a look at your dataset, your annotations and the model results. Why exactly are you interested in a high pixel F1 score? If youre images are very large and the defects are very small you can try to increase the image size to 384 or even 512
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
and note that f1-score is a bit of a harsh metric, penalizing the false positives. Please check your ground-truth and predictions. If predictions are slightly different than your ground-truth this will hurt your f1-score even though you think that the predictions look alright. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Since this is not an issue with Patchcore and more about a usecase issue, I'll convert this to a discussion. Thanks! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
PatchCore
Image high resolution 1280*1024
Minor defects
The training results were very poor
I'm not sure how to adjust the configuration or switch to any other model
Number of images
normal_dir: 560
abnormal_dir: 120
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions