Replies: 4 comments
-
but where would you get your image features at inference time from if the backbone wasn't involved? To increase the inference speed you could use smaller backbones (resnet 18, or even faster and smaller variants like mobilenets) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
As @alexriedel1 pointed out, I don't see how you could get the features needed at test time if you don't have the backbone. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@pure-rgb, as @alexriedel1 and @blaz-r pointed out, the backbone is still required to extract the features. Do you want to remove the backbone after extracting the features? If you refer to the captions of the figure, you could see that anomaly maps are computed from patch-features. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Converting this to discussion, let's continue there. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
What is the motivation for this task?
In patch core model, in inference time, the heavy backbone is not needed. Thus, if there is any functionality in the inference time for patch-core to remove the backbone, then the inference speed and latency would be greatly improved.
Describe the solution you'd like
Backbone (resnet) is only used for extracting feature. If it is active in inference time, it will only stay inactive and bright speed and space cost for nothing. In inference time, it would be effective it is removed or inactive properly.
Additional context
No response
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions