Replies: 1 comment
-
Hi @lraubuch, fully agree with you. @djdameln merged #2548. We'll release beta.3 asap. Regarding the release cycle, our internal security development lifecycle (SDL) caused some delays on the release cycles. We are currently working on a fully automated CD so we can have frequent release cycles. Great feedback, thanks again. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
As development for 2.0.0 goes on so does development in dependencies e.g. torch.
As for the latest breaking change in torch 2.6
weights_only
when runningtorch.load
, I think it would be a good time to release a new pre-release version of anomalib.Since the last release there have been multiple fixes included e.g. #2548 and #2508 which fix major problems and make it possible to run experiments which were previously only possible with version < 2 of anomalib.
Also the latest release to pip was about a month ago, which is somewhat of a long time for a pre-release version.
Maybe it would also be a great idea to have a release cycle of like every two weeks for a new pre-release version?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions