-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
feat: add missing steps for config and improve wording #311
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ Feature: flagd provider disconnect and reconnect functionality | |
| And a forbidden flagd provider | ||
| And a error event handler | ||
| Then the error event handler should have been executed within 5000ms | ||
| And the client is in fatal state | ||
| And the client should be in fatal state | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Should we use "provider" instead of "client"? In my understanding, the state of the provider (which the client is connected to) should be fatal, not the client itself.
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. depends, on how you check this. There has been already some discussion about this. if we call it
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I see. Just mentioned it because it confused me at first as in java the corresponding client method is |
||
|
|
||
| @targetURI @rpc | ||
| Scenario: Connection via TargetUri rpc | ||
|
|
||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.