Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Looks like I've found a temporary workaround,when use this directives('python tools/test.py configs/libra_rcnn/libra_faster_rcnn_r50_fpn_1x_coco.py work_dirs/libra_faster_rcnn_r50_fpn_1x_coco/latest.pth --out result/result.pkl --eval bbox --eval-options "proposal_nums=(1, 10, 100)"') to test ,and it work,like figure,

But when i use previous instructions to test and output like this,

So you can see the values of these indicators have hardly changed,Apart from this(in red line box):

So I'm not quite sure if this is really a valid modification,or if it just changes the print format of the output, and doesn't actually pass the parameters into cocoEval.

Replies: 2 comments 3 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
2 replies
@BIGWangYuDong
Comment options

@DiYaGo-zzh
Comment options

Answer selected by DiYaGo-zzh
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@DiYaGo-zzh
Comment options

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants