Skip to content

Conversation

@jjhursey
Copy link
Member

@jjhursey jjhursey commented Mar 25, 2020

bot:ibm:scale:120:test

bot:notacherrypick

@ibm-ompi
Copy link

The IBM CI (GNU/Scale) build failed! Please review the log, linked below.

Gist: https://gist.github.com/a7e20e927dfc4f784d2873c5df2eed4b

@jjhursey
Copy link
Member Author

bot:ibm:gnu:retest
bot:ibm:scale:70:test
bot:ibm:args:"-mca plm_rsh_no_tree_spawn 1"

@jjhursey
Copy link
Member Author

70 nodes seemed to work fine. Let's try up a few more.

bot:ibm:gnu:retest
bot:ibm:args:"-mca plm_rsh_no_tree_spawn 1"
bot:ibm:scale:100:test

@ibm-ompi
Copy link

The IBM CI (GNU/Scale) build failed! Please review the log, linked below.

Gist: https://gist.github.com/fd76b425e5217838a0919e1aafcd43a8

@jjhursey
Copy link
Member Author

Fell over at 100. Hard to tell via Jenkins if it was infrastructure or something else. We will have to hop into the VC environment and try it out.

@gpaulsen
Copy link
Member

bot:ibm:scale:99:test

@jjhursey
Copy link
Member Author

bot:ibm:gnu:retest
bot:ibm:scale:80:test

@gpaulsen
Copy link
Member

Lets see the state of things today:
bot:ibm:gnu:retest
bot:ibm:scale:80:test

@gpaulsen
Copy link
Member

bot:ibm:gnu:retest
bot:ibm:scale:80:test

@gpaulsen
Copy link
Member

bot:ibm:gnu:retest
bot:ibm:scale:70:test
bot:ibm:args:"-mca plm_rsh_no_tree_spawn 1"

@gpaulsen
Copy link
Member

July 31, 2020:

bot:ibm:gnu:retest
bot:ibm:scale:70:test
bot:ibm:args:"-mca plm_rsh_no_tree_spawn 1"

@gpaulsen
Copy link
Member

Aug 18, 2020:

bot:ibm:gnu:retest
bot:ibm:scale:70:test

@gpaulsen
Copy link
Member

Sept 14, 2020:

bot:ibm:gnu:retest
bot:ibm:scale:70:test

@gpaulsen
Copy link
Member

Sep 28, 2020:

bot:ibm:gnu:retest
bot:ibm:scale:70:test

@lanl-ompi
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@gpaulsen
Copy link
Member

gpaulsen commented Nov 2, 2020

Nov 2, 2020:

bot:ibm:gnu:retest
bot:ibm:scale:70:test

@gpaulsen
Copy link
Member

Feb 11, 2021

bot:ibm:gnu:retest
bot:ibm:scale:70:test

@jjhursey
Copy link
Member Author

bot:ibm:gnu:retest
bot:ibm:scale:12:test

1 similar comment
@gpaulsen
Copy link
Member

bot:ibm:gnu:retest
bot:ibm:scale:12:test

@gpaulsen
Copy link
Member

Nice, Passed March 22, 2021

@gpaulsen
Copy link
Member

bot:ibm:gnu:retest
bot:ibm:scale:12:test

1 similar comment
@gpaulsen
Copy link
Member

bot:ibm:gnu:retest
bot:ibm:scale:12:test

@gpaulsen
Copy link
Member

bot:ibm:scale:128:test

@awlauria
Copy link
Contributor

bot:ibm:retest

@ibm-ompi
Copy link

The IBM CI (GNU/Scale) build failed! Please review the log, linked below.

Gist: https://gist.github.com/c08bd9404c97a5b4d86ef21c5bfa3616

@jjhursey
Copy link
Member Author

Odd error. Let's try again

bot:ibm:retest

@gpaulsen
Copy link
Member

gpaulsen commented Jun 9, 2022

bot:ibm:retest

@ibm-ompi
Copy link

ibm-ompi commented Jun 9, 2022

The IBM CI (GNU/Scale) build failed! Please review the log, linked below.

Gist: https://gist.github.com/7ff9d0a3164cdddcc4c6b055778b8ff6

@jjhursey
Copy link
Member Author

jjhursey commented Jun 9, 2022

retry bot:ibm:gnu:retest

@gpaulsen
Copy link
Member

bot:ibm:scale:12:test

@gpaulsen
Copy link
Member

bot:ibm:scale:80:test

@jjhursey
Copy link
Member Author

bot:ibm:retest
bot:ibm:nodes:32:test
bot:ibm:ppn:2:test

@gpaulsen
Copy link
Member

gpaulsen commented Jan 6, 2023

Trying a new scale test run Jan 2023:
bot:ibm:retest
bot:ibm:nodes:32:test
bot:ibm:ppn:2:test

@gpaulsen
Copy link
Member

Retrying. The details link appears broken:
bot:ibm:retest
bot:ibm:nodes:32:test
bot:ibm:ppn:2:test

Signed-off-by: Joshua Hursey <[email protected]>
@jjhursey
Copy link
Member Author

jjhursey commented Jul 3, 2023

bot:ibm:retest
bot:ibm:nodes:16:test
bot:ibm:ppn:2:test

1 similar comment
@gpaulsen
Copy link
Member

bot:ibm:retest
bot:ibm:nodes:16:test
bot:ibm:ppn:2:test

@bwbarrett
Copy link
Member

We haven't used this PR to test CI kick-off in over 2 years, so closing.

@bwbarrett bwbarrett closed this Oct 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants