Skip to content

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Sep 9, 2025

This change adds the assign-owners: false parameter to the dyladan/component-owners action in the assign-reviewers workflow.

The dyladan/component-owners action in .github/workflows/assign-reviewers.yml was configured to only assign reviewers based on the component ownership defined in .github/component_owners.yml. However, without the assign-owners: false parameter, the action may also attempt to assign owners as assignees to pull requests.

By adding assign-owners: false, we ensure that the action only assigns reviewers and does not automatically assign the component owners as assignees to pull requests, which provides better control over the assignment workflow.

Changes made:

  • Added assign-owners: false parameter to the dyladan/component-owners@58bd86e9814d23f1525d0a970682cead459fa783 action in .github/workflows/assign-reviewers.yml

This is a minimal configuration change that clarifies the intended behavior of the component owners workflow.


💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Add assign-owners: false to dyladan/component-owners - uses: dyladan/component-owners@main with: assign-owners: false Add assign-owners: false to dyladan/component-owners workflow Sep 9, 2025
Copilot AI requested a review from trask September 9, 2025 04:17
Copilot finished work on behalf of trask September 9, 2025 04:17
@trask trask marked this pull request as ready for review September 9, 2025 04:21
@trask trask requested a review from a team as a code owner September 9, 2025 04:21
@laurit laurit added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 9, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 5a9d415 Sep 9, 2025
25 checks passed
@laurit laurit deleted the copilot/add-assign-owners-false-option branch September 9, 2025 04:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants