Skip to content

feat(kafka-clients): add messaging.kafka.bootstrap.servers attribute #14032

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 19 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

feat(kafka-clients): add messaging.kafka.bootstrap.servers attribute #14032

wants to merge 19 commits into from

Conversation

@wl2027
Copy link
Contributor

@wl2027 wl2027 commented Jun 13, 2025 •
edited
Loading

  • Java agent instrumentation obtains bootstrap.servers through constructor instrumentation
  • Library instrumentation obtains bootstrap.servers through reflection and kafka-clients interceptors
  • Use VirtualField for managing bootstrap servers storage
  • Include bootstrap.servers attribute in all relevant spans

#14031 #10647

wl2027 and others added 2 commits June 13, 2025 21:52
@wl2027
feat(kafka-clients): add messaging.kafka.bootstrap.servers attribute
f5f0070 
- Add VirtualFieldStore for managing bootstrap servers storage
- Instrument KafkaConsumer and KafkaProducer constructors
- Include bootstrap.servers attribute in all relevant spans

Addresses part of open-telemetry#14031 open-telemetry#10647
@wl2027
Merge branch 'open-telemetry:main' into kafka-client
f0b98c8
@wl2027 wl2027 requested a review from a team as a code owner June 13, 2025 14:07
@github-actions github-actions bot added the test native This label can be applied to PRs to trigger them to run native tests label Jun 13, 2025
wl2027 and others added 3 commits June 14, 2025 16:55
@otelbot-java-instrumentation
Copy link
Contributor

otelbot-java-instrumentation bot commented Jun 14, 2025

🔧 The result from spotlessApply was committed to the PR branch.

@wl2027
Copy link
Contributor Author

wl2027 commented Jun 16, 2025

Hi @laurit , Could you review this PR? Thanks!

@breedx-splk
Copy link
Contributor

breedx-splk commented Jun 16, 2025

Thanks! It would be nice if the new attribute would be proposed in https://github.com/open-telemetry/semantic-conventions/blob/main/docs/messaging/kafka.md as well...just sayin'.

@wl2027 @breedx-splk
fix
07e095d 
Co-authored-by: jason plumb <[email protected]>
@wl2027
Copy link
Contributor Author

wl2027 commented Jun 17, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Thanks! It would be nice if the new attribute would be proposed in https://github.com/open-telemetry/semantic-conventions/blob/main/docs/messaging/kafka.md as well...just sayin'.

Thanks for the suggestion! I will first place this attribute in ExperimentalAttributesExtractor, and then create a separate PR to the semantic-conventions repository to propose this new attribute. This ensures standardization for implementations in other languages. However, I'm unsure whether other languages also find it difficult to obtain kafka-clients' server.* and network.* attributes, leading them to implement and use messaging.kafka.bootstrap.servers.

@wl2027
Copy link
Contributor Author

wl2027 commented Jun 23, 2025

Hi @laurit ,May I ask what should be done about the failures in the markdown-link-check and instrumentation restlet muzzle stages? These errors don't seem to be caused by my modifications, nor do they appear to be issues that my PR should address. Additionally, I've noticed that these two stages have also been failing in recent submissions from other PRs. Should I wait for these issues to be fixed before merge my code?

@trask
Copy link
Member

trask commented Jun 23, 2025

Hi @laurit ,May I ask what should be done about the failures in the markdown-link-check and instrumentation restlet muzzle stages? These errors don't seem to be caused by my modifications, nor do they appear to be issues that my PR should address. Additionally, I've noticed that these two stages have also been failing in recent submissions from other PRs. Should I wait for these issues to be fixed before merge my code?

you can ignore these failures, they will not hold up review or merging

@wl2027 wl2027 requested review from breedx-splk and laurit June 24, 2025 02:58
@wl2027 wl2027 mentioned this pull request Oct 29, 2025
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@laurit laurit Awaiting requested review from laurit

@breedx-splk breedx-splk Awaiting requested review from breedx-splk

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

test native This label can be applied to PRs to trigger them to run native tests

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@wl2027 @breedx-splk @trask @laurit