Run CodeQL on PRs

[trask]

This is why OSSF Scorecard for SAST is only 7/10.

Related to #7068

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.84%. Comparing base (9f0a291) to head (48cb63b).
Report is 11 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #7070   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     89.84%   89.84%           
  Complexity     6610     6610           
=========================================
  Files           740      740           
  Lines         19981    19981           
  Branches       1966     1966           
=========================================
  Hits          17951    17951           
  Misses         1440     1440           
  Partials        590      590           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-advanced-security]

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

[jack-berg]

We don't have branches matching the v* pattern.

[trask]

https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-java/branches/all?page=3

but I think you're right though that they shouldn't be needed here, let me try removing in instrumentation repo first to make sure OSSF doesn't get mad

[trask]

yup, these aren't needed

[jack-berg]

Ah the old release strategy. Yes, we should never push to these branches.

[jack-berg]

Redundant?

Suggested change

contents: read

[trask]

my understanding is

• technically the non-presence here removes a workflow-level permission (as opposed to being additive)
• but that since our repos are public, you can never take away contents: read

so I think I can remove them, let me try this in instrumentation repo first also...

[trask]

this didn't work, see explanation in open-telemetry/opentelemetry-java-instrumentation#13247

[jack-berg]

Thanks for trying.