Update Gemini example with full review workflow

Author: kraih

docs/UserAPI.md

@@ -77,38 +77,37 @@ $ gemini mcp add cavil https://legaldb.suse.de/mcp -H 'Authorization: Bearer gen
 After restarting gemini-cli, it will automatically discover available Cavil tools and make use of them on its own:
 
 ```
-╭──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
-│  > You are a legal reviewer for SUSE Linux Enterprise. Take a look at legal  │
-│    report 1 and make a recommendation if that package update should be       │
-│    accepted for distribution to customers.                                   │
-╰──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯
-
- ╭─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
- │ ✔ cavil_get_report (cavil MCP Server) {"package_id":1}                      │
- │                                                                             │
- │    ...                                                                      │
- ╰─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯
-
-✦ Based on my review of the legal report for perl-Mojolicious version 7.25, I
-  recommend acceptance of the package for distribution.
-
-  Justification:
-
-   1. Licenses: The package is primarily licensed under the Artistic License
-      2.0, with other files covered by compatible and acceptable licenses
-      such as Apache-2.0, MIT, and CC-BY-SA-4.0. These are all standard and
-      approved open-source licenses.
-   2. High-Risk Item: The single file flagged with "Risk 9 (Unknown)",
-      Mojolicious-7.25/lib/Mojolicious/Guides/Contributing.pod, is a false
-      positive. The flagged text is a standard part of a contributor's guide,
-      instructing on code review practices, and is not a license.
-   3. No Other Issues: The report does not indicate any other legal
-      encumbrances. The email addresses and URLs are standard for an
-      open-source project and do not present any concerns.
-
-  The package is legally sound and meets the criteria for inclusion in SUSE
-  Linux Enterprise.
-
+> You are a legal reviewer for SUSE Linux Enterprise. Take a look at
+   report 472890 and make a recommendation if that package update
+   should be accepted for distribution to customers. Don't be too
+   critical of legal risks classified as low by the license scanner.
+
+✦ I will retrieve the legal report for package ID 472890 to evaluate
+  its distribution suitability.
+
+╭────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
+│ ✓  cavil_get_report (cavil MCP Server) {"package_id":472890}       │
+│                                                                    │
+│    ...                                                             │
+╰────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯
+✦ The legal report for perl-Mojo-JWT (ID 472890) indicates that all
+  identified risks are classified as "Low". The primary license is
+  Artistic-1.0-Perl OR GPL-1.0-or-later, which is standard and
+  acceptable for Perl modules within SUSE distributions. Since there
+  are no significant changes from previous versions and no high-risk
+  concerns, I recommend accepting this package update.
+
+
+╭────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
+│ ✓  cavil_accept_review (cavil MCP Server) {"reason":"Standard Per… │
+│                                                                    │
+│    ...                                                             │
+╰────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯
+✦ I have reviewed report 472890 for the perl-Mojo-JWT package. The
+  licenses found (Artistic-1.0-Perl OR GPL-1.0-or-later) are standard
+  for Perl modules and all identified risks were classified as low.
+  Finding no significant issues or deviations from previous versions,
+  I have accepted the review for distribution.
 ```
 
 #### opencode