You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Replaces "should strive" below with "strives" since "should" could be construed to have specific meaning per RFC2119
> Q: What happens to AppC or Docker Image Formats?
> A: ... The OCI Image Format project should strive to provide a dependable open specification ...
Signed-off-by: Rob Dolin <[email protected]>
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: README.md
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ A: We are seeing many independent implementations of container image handling in
48
48
49
49
**Q: What happens to AppC or Docker Image Formats?**
50
50
51
-
A: Existing formats can continue to be a proving ground for technologies, as needed. The OCI Image Format project should strive to provide a dependable open specification that can be shared between different tools and be evolved for years or decades of compatibility; as the deb and rpm format have.
51
+
A: Existing formats can continue to be a proving ground for technologies, as needed. The OCI Image Format project strives to provide a dependable open specification that can be shared between different tools and be evolved for years or decades of compatibility; as the deb and rpm format have.
0 commit comments