Skip to content

Commit d791113

Browse files
committed
[ReadMe] Consistent indented portions of Table of Contents
Signed-off-by: Rob Dolin <[email protected]>
1 parent f955d90 commit d791113

File tree

1 file changed

+5
-4
lines changed

1 file changed

+5
-4
lines changed

README.md

Lines changed: 5 additions & 4 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -13,11 +13,12 @@ Table of Contents
1313
- [Implementations](implementations.md)
1414
- [project](project.md)
1515
- [Filesystem Bundle](bundle.md)
16-
- [Runtime and Lifecycle](runtime.md)
17-
- [Linux Specific Runtime](runtime-linux.md)
16+
- Runtime and Lifecycle
17+
- [General Runtime and Lifecycle](runtime.md)
18+
- [Linux-specific Runtime and Lifecycle](runtime-linux.md)
1819
- Configuration
19-
- [General](config.md)
20-
- [Linux-specific](config-linux.md)
20+
- [General Configuration](config.md)
21+
- [Linux-specific Configuration](config-linux.md)
2122
- [Glossary](glossary.md)
2223

2324
In the specifications in the above table of contents, the keywords "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" are to be interpreted as described in [RFC 2119](http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119) (Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997).

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)