This repository takes long time to clone, causing issues with ArgoCD and Kustomize, neither of which can do shallow or sparse cloning

[jiridanek]

[jiridanek]

@coderabbitai investigate

[coderabbitai]

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
echo "=== Repository Size Analysis ==="
echo

# Check overall repository size
echo "1. Overall repository size:"
du -sh .git 2>/dev/null || echo ".git directory not found"
du -sh . 2>/dev/null
echo

# Find top 20 largest directories
echo "2. Top 20 largest directories:"
du -h -d 2 . 2>/dev/null | sort -rh | head -20
echo

# Find large files (over 1MB)
echo "3. Files larger than 1MB:"
find . -type f -size +1M -exec ls -lh {} \; 2>/dev/null | awk '{print $9, $5}' | sort -k2 -rh | head -20
echo

# Check for common large file types
echo "4. Count of potentially large file types:"
echo "Images (jpg, jpeg, png, gif, svg):"
fd -e jpg -e jpeg -e png -e gif -e svg | wc -l
echo "PDFs:"
fd -e pdf | wc -l
echo "Archives (zip, tar, gz):"
fd -e zip -e tar -e gz -e tgz | wc -l
echo "Binary/executable files:"
fd -e exe -e bin -e so -e dll | wc -l
echo

# Check git object database
echo "5. Git object database analysis:"
git count-objects -vH 2>/dev/null || echo "Git command failed"
echo

# Find largest objects in git history
echo "6. Top 10 largest objects in git history:"
git rev-list --objects --all | \
  git cat-file --batch-check='%(objecttype) %(objectname) %(objectsize) %(rest)' | \
  sed -n 's/^blob //p' | \
  sort -n -k2 -r | \
  head -10 | \
  while read size path; do
    echo "$(numfmt --to=iec-i --suffix=B $size) $path"
  done 2>/dev/null || echo "Failed to analyze git history"

Length of output: 3459

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
echo "=== Detailed VSIX Files Analysis ==="
echo

# Find all VSIX files
echo "1. All VSIX files in the repository:"
find . -name "*.vsix" -type f -exec ls -lh {} \; | awk '{print $9, $5}'
echo

# Check if VSIX files are in .gitignore
echo "2. Checking .gitignore for VSIX patterns:"
if [ -f .gitignore ]; then
    grep -i "vsix" .gitignore || echo "No VSIX patterns found in .gitignore"
else
    echo ".gitignore file not found"
fi
echo

# Check git status for these files
echo "3. Git tracking status of VSIX files:"
git ls-files | grep -i "\.vsix$" | head -20
echo

# Count total VSIX files tracked by git
echo "4. Total VSIX files tracked in git:"
git ls-files | grep -c "\.vsix$"
echo

# Check for duplicates across directories
echo "5. VSIX file duplication analysis:"
find . -name "*.vsix" -type f -exec basename {} \; | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn
echo

# Look for other potential large binary files
echo "6. Other potential binary files in the repository:"
git ls-files | grep -E "\.(whl|tar\.gz|zip|jar|exe|dll|so|dylib|deb|rpm)$" | head -20
echo

# Check if there's a README explaining the VSIX files
echo "7. Checking for documentation about utils/VSIX files:"
fd README -t f | xargs grep -l -i "vsix\|extension\|utils" 2>/dev/null | head -5

Length of output: 3885

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
echo "=== Investigating VSIX Usage and Existing Issues ==="
echo

# Check how VSIX files are used in Dockerfiles
echo "1. How VSIX files are used in Dockerfiles:"
rg -A 3 -B 3 "\.vsix" --type dockerfile | head -30
echo

# Check if there are any scripts that download or manage VSIX files
echo "2. Scripts managing VSIX files:"
rg -l "vsix|vscode.*extension" --type sh --type py | head -10
echo

# Check existing issues mentioning repository size or cloning
echo "3. Checking existing issues about repository size:"
gh issue list --repo opendatahub-io/notebooks --search "clone OR size OR slow OR argo OR kustomize OR vsix OR extension" --limit 10
echo

# Check if there's a CI/CD process that uses these files
echo "4. CI/CD usage of VSIX files:"
fd -e yaml -e yml | xargs grep -l "vsix" 2>/dev/null | head -10
echo

# Look at the Dockerfile to understand how extensions are installed
echo "5. Dockerfile content for VSIX installation:"
cat codeserver/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile | grep -A 5 -B 5 "vsix" | head -30

Length of output: 1187

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
echo "=== Investigating VSIX File Usage ==="
echo

# Find Dockerfiles and check VSIX usage
echo "1. Finding Dockerfiles that use VSIX files:"
fd Dockerfile | head -10
echo

# Check VSIX usage in any Dockerfile
echo "2. VSIX usage in Dockerfiles:"
fd Dockerfile | xargs grep -l "vsix" 2>/dev/null
echo

# Look at actual VSIX installation in a Dockerfile
echo "3. Example of VSIX installation in Dockerfile:"
if [ -f "codeserver/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.cpu" ]; then
    grep -A 5 -B 5 "vsix" codeserver/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.cpu | head -40
else
    fd Dockerfile | head -1 | xargs grep -A 5 -B 5 "vsix" | head -40
fi
echo

# Check if there's a script that downloads these extensions
echo "4. Checking for download scripts:"
rg "curl.*vsix|wget.*vsix|download.*extension" | head -10
echo

# Check the utils directory structure
echo "5. Utils directory structure:"
ls -la codeserver/ubi9-python-3.12/utils/ 2>/dev/null | head -20
echo

# Look for any documentation about these extensions
echo "6. Documentation mentioning extensions:"
rg -i "vscode.*extension|vsix" README.md 2>/dev/null || echo "Not found in main README"
fd README | xargs grep -l -i "extension\|vsix" 2>/dev/null | head -5
echo

# Check if there's a Makefile that handles these files
echo "7. Makefile references to VSIX:"
if [ -f "Makefile" ]; then
    grep -i "vsix\|extension" Makefile | head -10
fi

Length of output: 3509

---

@jiridanek I've completed the investigation of the repository size issue. Here's my analysis:

📊 Repository Size Analysis

Root Cause

The primary issue is VS Code extension files (VSIX) stored directly in the repository:

• 73MB in codeserver/ directory (55% of total repo size)
• 14 VSIX files tracked in git, duplicated across ubi9-python-3.11 and ubi9-python-3.12
• 40MB git history containing old versions of these extensions
• Total repository size: 132MB

Impact on ArgoCD/Kustomize

These tools cannot perform shallow or sparse cloning, forcing them to download:

1. All current VSIX files (73MB)
2. Complete git history with old versions (40MB)
3. Making each clone operation slow and resource-intensive

🎯 Recommended Solutions

Option 1: Download Extensions at Build Time (Recommended)

Pros:

• Reduces repo size by 55%
• Always uses latest compatible versions
• No git history bloat

Implementation:

# Instead of COPY from utils/, download during build
RUN code-server --install-extension ms-python.python@2025.2.0 \
    --extensions-dir /opt/app-root/extensions-temp && \
    code-server --install-extension ms-toolsai.jupyter@2025.2.0 \
    --extensions-dir /opt/app-root/extensions-temp

Option 2: Git LFS (Large File Storage)

Pros:

• Keeps current workflow
• Binary files stored separately
• Faster clones

Implementation:

git lfs track "*.vsix"
git add .gitattributes
git lfs migrate import --include="*.vsix" --everything

Option 3: External Artifact Repository

Store extensions in S3, Artifactory, or GitHub Releases and download during build.

🚀 Immediate Actions

1. Quick Win: Add VSIX files to .gitignore for future commits
2. Clean History: Use git-filter-repo to remove VSIX files from history
3. Long-term: Implement build-time download approach

Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track this improvement with detailed implementation steps?

---

🧠 Learnings used

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1269
File: codeserver/ubi9-python-3.12/utils/process.sh:17-19
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T14:00:00.909Z
Learning: jiridanek efficiently identifies when CodeRabbit review suggestions are already covered by existing comprehensive issues, demonstrating excellent issue management and avoiding duplicate tracking of the same improvements across multiple locations.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1151
File: jupyter/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/test/test_notebook.ipynb:31-34
Timestamp: 2025-07-01T07:03:05.385Z
Learning: jiridanek demonstrates excellent pattern recognition for identifying duplicated code issues across the opendatahub-io/notebooks repository. When spotting a potential problem in test notebooks, he correctly assesses that such patterns are likely replicated across multiple similar files rather than being isolated incidents, leading to more effective systematic solutions.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1269
File: codeserver/ubi9-python-3.12/nginx/root/usr/share/container-scripts/nginx/common.sh:1-3
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T12:07:19.365Z
Learning: jiridanek consistently requests GitHub issue creation for technical improvements identified during code reviews in opendatahub-io/notebooks, ensuring systematic tracking of code quality enhancements like shell script portability issues with comprehensive descriptions, solution options, and acceptance criteria.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-22T06:02:15.056Z
Learning: jiridanek provided actual Trivy vulnerability report URL for PR #1425, validating the previously identified concern about exit-code: '0' configuration preventing security workflow failures. This demonstrates that the security scanning is successfully detecting vulnerabilities but not blocking CI due to the configuration issue raised in issue #1427.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1333
File: runtimes/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Pipfile:13-15
Timestamp: 2025-07-08T19:29:32.006Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for investigating TensorFlow "and-cuda" extras usage patterns during PR #1333 review. Issue #1345 was created with comprehensive investigation framework covering platform-specific analysis, deployment scenarios, TensorFlow version compatibility, clear acceptance criteria, and testing approach, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1259
File: jupyter/rocm/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.rocm:56-66
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T18:19:49.397Z
Learning: jiridanek consistently creates comprehensive follow-up GitHub issues for security concerns raised during PR reviews in opendatahub-io/notebooks, ensuring systematic tracking and resolution of supply-chain security improvements like GPG signature verification for package repositories.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1333
File: runtimes/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Pipfile:13-15
Timestamp: 2025-07-08T19:29:32.006Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for investigating TensorFlow "and-cuda" extras usage patterns during PR #1333 review. Issue #1340 was created with comprehensive investigation framework covering platform-specific analysis, deployment scenarios, TensorFlow version compatibility, clear acceptance criteria, testing approach, and implementation timeline, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1259
File: jupyter/rocm/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/test/test_notebook.ipynb:22-29
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T18:27:51.097Z
Learning: jiridanek consistently creates comprehensive follow-up GitHub issues from PR review comments in opendatahub-io/notebooks, turning specific code quality concerns into systematic improvements tracked with proper context, acceptance criteria, and cross-references. Issue #1266 demonstrates this pattern by expanding a specific error handling concern in load_expected_versions() into a repository-wide improvement initiative.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T13:33:55.209Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for smart-open library S3/GCS backend compatibility concern in PR #1269. Issue #1296 was successfully created with comprehensive problem description, acceptance criteria, implementation guidance, testing approach, and proper context linking, following the established pattern of systematic issue tracking for technical improvements.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1269
File: codeserver/ubi9-python-3.12/requirements.txt:435-444
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T13:59:55.040Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for numpy/scipy compatibility investigation in PR #1269, specifically for cases where theoretical version conflicts don't manifest as actual build failures. Issue #1297 was created with comprehensive investigation framework, acceptance criteria, runtime testing approach, and proper context linking, demonstrating the pattern of creating investigation-type issues for apparent but non-blocking technical concerns that require deeper understanding.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#968
File: codeserver/ubi9-python-3.11/Dockerfile.cpu:138-140
Timestamp: 2025-08-01T16:07:58.701Z
Learning: jiridanek prefers architectural solutions that eliminate problems entirely rather than just fixing immediate technical issues. When presented with a pipeline safety concern about micropipenv requirements generation, he suggested removing micropipenv from the build process altogether by using pre-committed requirements.txt files, demonstrating preference for simplification and deterministic builds over complex workarounds.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1600
File: Makefile:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T08:49:03.735Z
Learning: jiridanek decided to eliminate '+' characters entirely from Makefile target names during PR #1600 review instead of implementing complex substitution workarounds, demonstrating his consistent preference for architectural solutions that eliminate problems at the source rather than adding complexity to handle edge cases.

[jiridanek]

@coderabbitai write detailed implementation steps for the lfs option as a comment on this issue

[coderabbitai]

📦 Git LFS Implementation Guide for VSIX Files

Overview

This guide provides step-by-step instructions to migrate the VS Code extension files (VSIX) to Git LFS, reducing repository clone size by ~55% while maintaining the current workflow.

Prerequisites

• Git LFS installed locally (git lfs version should work)
• Write access to the repository
• Backup of the repository before migration

Implementation Steps

Step 1: Install and Initialize Git LFS

# Install Git LFS (if not already installed)
# On macOS: brew install git-lfs
# On Ubuntu/Debian: apt-get install git-lfs
# On RHEL/Fedora: dnf install git-lfs

# Initialize Git LFS in the repository
git lfs install

Step 2: Track VSIX Files with Git LFS

# Track all VSIX files
git lfs track "*.vsix"

# This creates/updates .gitattributes
# Verify the .gitattributes file
cat .gitattributes
# Should show: *.vsix filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text

# Commit the .gitattributes changes
git add .gitattributes
git commit -m "chore: configure Git LFS for VSIX files"

Step 3: Migrate Existing VSIX Files to LFS

# Option A: Migrate only current branch (faster, recommended for initial testing)
git lfs migrate import --include="*.vsix" --no-rewrite

# Option B: Migrate entire history (comprehensive, requires force push)
git lfs migrate import --include="*.vsix" --everything

# Verify migration
git lfs ls-files
# Should list all 14 VSIX files currently in the repository

Step 4: Push Changes

# Push the LFS objects and updated references
git push origin main

# If you used Option B (history rewrite), you'll need force push:
# git push origin main --force
# ⚠️ Coordinate with team before force pushing!

Step 5: Update CI/CD Pipelines

GitHub Actions - Add LFS checkout to workflows:

- name: Checkout code
  uses: actions/checkout@v4
  with:
    lfs: true

Tekton/OpenShift Pipelines - Ensure Git LFS is available:

- name: git-clone
  taskRef:
    name: git-clone
  params:
    - name: url
      value: https://github.com/opendatahub-io/notebooks
    - name: gitInitImage
      value: registry.redhat.io/openshift-pipelines/pipelines-git-init-rhel8:v1.8.2
      # Ensure this image includes git-lfs

Step 6: Update Build Scripts

Verify Dockerfiles still work correctly:

# In codeserver/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.cpu and similar files
# This should continue to work unchanged:
COPY utils/*.vsix /tmp/

Step 7: Verify ArgoCD/Kustomize Performance

After migration, test with ArgoCD:

# Clone without LFS files (what ArgoCD might do)
git clone --filter=blob:none --sparse https://github.com/opendatahub-io/notebooks.git test-clone
cd test-clone
git sparse-checkout init --cone
git sparse-checkout set manifests/  # or relevant paths for ArgoCD

# Measure clone time and size
du -sh .

Documentation Updates

1. Update README.md:

## Development Setup

### Prerequisites
- Git LFS is required for working with VS Code extension files
- Install: `git lfs install`
- After cloning: `git lfs pull` (if files are missing)

2. Create docs/GIT_LFS.md with troubleshooting guide

Verification Checklist

• All 14 VSIX files tracked by LFS (git lfs ls-files | wc -l should return 14)
• Repository size reduced for new clones without LFS
• Docker builds still work correctly
• CI/CD pipelines pass
• ArgoCD sync time improved
• Existing PRs can be rebased without issues

Rollback Plan

If issues arise, revert to storing files directly:

# Remove LFS tracking
git lfs untrack "*.vsix"
git rm .gitattributes
git add codeserver/*/utils/*.vsix
git commit -m "revert: remove Git LFS tracking for VSIX files"

Expected Outcomes

Metric	Before	After
Clone size (with history)	132MB	~60MB
Clone size (shallow)	92MB	~20MB
ArgoCD sync time	Slow	Improved
Developer experience	Normal	Requires git-lfs

Additional Considerations

1. Team Communication: Notify all developers about the LFS requirement
2. Binary File Policy: Consider establishing a policy for future binary files
3. LFS Quota: GitHub provides 1GB storage and 1GB/month bandwidth free (should be sufficient)
4. Alternative: Still consider Option 1 (download at build time) for long-term sustainability

Resources

• Git LFS Documentation
• GitHub LFS Guide
• Migrating to Git LFS

---

Implementation guide generated by CodeRabbit based on repository analysis showing 73MB of VSIX files causing clone performance issues.

[coderabbitai]

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

@jiridanek, I've posted detailed implementation steps for the Git LFS option as a comment on issue #1789. The guide includes:

• Prerequisites and setup requirements
• Step-by-step migration process with both conservative and comprehensive options
• CI/CD updates for GitHub Actions and Tekton
• Verification checklist to ensure successful migration
• Rollback plan in case issues arise
• Expected outcomes with before/after metrics
• Additional considerations including team communication and LFS quotas

The implementation will reduce repository clone size from 132MB to ~60MB (with history) or from 92MB to ~20MB (shallow clone), significantly improving ArgoCD and Kustomize performance.

The guide is now available on the issue for the team to review and follow when ready to implement.

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Post detailed Git LFS implementation steps as a comment on issue #1789
gh issue comment 1789 --repo opendatahub-io/notebooks --body "## 📦 Git LFS Implementation Guide for VSIX Files

### Overview
This guide provides step-by-step instructions to migrate the VS Code extension files (VSIX) to Git LFS, reducing repository clone size by ~55% while maintaining the current workflow.

### Prerequisites
- Git LFS installed locally (\`git lfs version\` should work)
- Write access to the repository
- Backup of the repository before migration

### Implementation Steps

#### Step 1: Install and Initialize Git LFS
\`\`\`bash
# Install Git LFS (if not already installed)
# On macOS: brew install git-lfs
# On Ubuntu/Debian: apt-get install git-lfs
# On RHEL/Fedora: dnf install git-lfs

# Initialize Git LFS in the repository
git lfs install
\`\`\`

#### Step 2: Track VSIX Files with Git LFS
\`\`\`bash
# Track all VSIX files
git lfs track \"*.vsix\"

# This creates/updates .gitattributes
# Verify the .gitattributes file
cat .gitattributes
# Should show: *.vsix filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text

# Commit the .gitattributes changes
git add .gitattributes
git commit -m \"chore: configure Git LFS for VSIX files\"
\`\`\`

#### Step 3: Migrate Existing VSIX Files to LFS
\`\`\`bash
# Option A: Migrate only current branch (faster, recommended for initial testing)
git lfs migrate import --include=\"*.vsix\" --no-rewrite

# Option B: Migrate entire history (comprehensive, requires force push)
git lfs migrate import --include=\"*.vsix\" --everything

# Verify migration
git lfs ls-files
# Should list all 14 VSIX files currently in the repository
\`\`\`

#### Step 4: Push Changes
\`\`\`bash
# Push the LFS objects and updated references
git push origin main

# If you used Option B (history rewrite), you'll need force push:
# git push origin main --force
# ⚠️ Coordinate with team before force pushing!
\`\`\`

#### Step 5: Update CI/CD Pipelines

**GitHub Actions** - Add LFS checkout to workflows:
\`\`\`yaml
- name: Checkout code
  uses: actions/checkout@v4
  with:
    lfs: true
\`\`\`

**Tekton/OpenShift Pipelines** - Ensure Git LFS is available:
\`\`\`yaml
- name: git-clone
  taskRef:
    name: git-clone
  params:
    - name: url
      value: https://github.com/opendatahub-io/notebooks
    - name: gitInitImage
      value: registry.redhat.io/openshift-pipelines/pipelines-git-init-rhel8:v1.8.2
      # Ensure this image includes git-lfs
\`\`\`

#### Step 6: Update Build Scripts
Verify Dockerfiles still work correctly:
\`\`\`dockerfile
# In codeserver/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.cpu and similar files
# This should continue to work unchanged:
COPY utils/*.vsix /tmp/
\`\`\`

#### Step 7: Verify ArgoCD/Kustomize Performance

After migration, test with ArgoCD:
\`\`\`bash
# Clone without LFS files (what ArgoCD might do)
git clone --filter=blob:none --sparse https://github.com/opendatahub-io/notebooks.git test-clone
cd test-clone
git sparse-checkout init --cone
git sparse-checkout set manifests/  # or relevant paths for ArgoCD

# Measure clone time and size
du -sh .
\`\`\`

### Documentation Updates

1. Update README.md:
\`\`\`markdown
## Development Setup

### Prerequisites
- Git LFS is required for working with VS Code extension files
- Install: \`git lfs install\`
- After cloning: \`git lfs pull\` (if files are missing)
\`\`\`

2. Create docs/GIT_LFS.md with troubleshooting guide

### Verification Checklist

- [ ] All 14 VSIX files tracked by LFS (\`git lfs ls-files | wc -l\` should return 14)
- [ ] Repository size reduced for new clones without LFS
- [ ] Docker builds still work correctly
- [ ] CI/CD pipelines pass
- [ ] ArgoCD sync time improved
- [ ] Existing PRs can be rebased without issues

### Rollback Plan

If issues arise, revert to storing files directly:
\`\`\`bash
# Remove LFS tracking
git lfs untrack \"*.vsix\"
git rm .gitattributes
git add codeserver/*/utils/*.vsix
git commit -m \"revert: remove Git LFS tracking for VSIX files\"
\`\`\`

### Expected Outcomes

| Metric | Before | After |
|--------|--------|-------|
| Clone size (with history) | 132MB | ~60MB |
| Clone size (shallow) | 92MB | ~20MB |
| ArgoCD sync time | Slow | Improved |
| Developer experience | Normal | Requires git-lfs |

### Additional Considerations

1. **Team Communication**: Notify all developers about the LFS requirement
2. **Binary File Policy**: Consider establishing a policy for future binary files
3. **LFS Quota**: GitHub provides 1GB storage and 1GB/month bandwidth free (should be sufficient)
4. **Alternative**: Still consider Option 1 (download at build time) for long-term sustainability

### Resources
- [Git LFS Documentation](https://git-lfs.github.com/)
- [GitHub LFS Guide](https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/working-with-files/managing-large-files/about-git-large-file-storage)
- [Migrating to Git LFS](https://github.com/git-lfs/git-lfs/wiki/Tutorial#migrating-existing-repository-data-to-lfs)

---
*Implementation guide generated by CodeRabbit based on repository analysis showing 73MB of VSIX files causing clone performance issues.*"

Length of output: 5025

---

@jiridanek, I've successfully posted the detailed Git LFS implementation guide as a comment on issue #1789. You can view it here: #1789 (comment)

The guide includes comprehensive step-by-step instructions, verification checklist, rollback plan, and expected performance improvements. The implementation would reduce clone sizes significantly while maintaining your current workflow with the VSIX files.

---

🧠 Learnings used

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1365
File: .github/workflows/insta-merge.yaml:1-1
Timestamp: 2025-07-09T14:41:52.874Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for YAML linting problems caused by the new GitHub Actions workflow in PR #1365, specifically addressing failures in the repository's YAML linter due to the insta-merge.yaml workflow file. Issue was created with comprehensive problem description covering potential indentation, quoting, line length, and structural issues, detailed root cause analysis, four solution options (fixing current file, implementing linting rules, automated formatting, repository-wide standardization), clear acceptance criteria, implementation guidance with testing approach, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1320
File: jupyter/pytorch/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.cuda:65-66
Timestamp: 2025-07-09T12:31:02.033Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for MSSQL repo file hardcoding problem during PR #1320 review. Issue #1363 was created and updated with comprehensive problem description covering hardcoded x86_64 MSSQL repo files breaking multi-architecture builds across 10 affected Dockerfiles (including datascience, CUDA, ROCm, and TrustyAI variants), detailed root cause analysis, three solution options with code examples, clear acceptance criteria for all image types, implementation guidance following established multi-architecture patterns, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1365
File: .github/workflows/insta-merge.yaml:1-1
Timestamp: 2025-07-09T14:41:52.874Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for YAML linting problems caused by the new GitHub Actions workflow in PR #1365, specifically addressing failures in the repository's YAML linter due to the insta-merge.yaml workflow file. Issue #1370 was successfully created with comprehensive problem description covering potential indentation, quoting, line length, and structural issues, detailed root cause analysis, four solution options (fixing current file, implementing linting rules, automated formatting, repository-wide standardization), clear acceptance criteria, implementation guidance with testing approach, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1320
File: jupyter/pytorch/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.cuda:65-66
Timestamp: 2025-07-09T12:31:02.033Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for MSSQL repo file hardcoding problem during PR #1320 review. Issue #1357 was created with comprehensive problem description covering hardcoded x86_64 MSSQL repo files breaking multi-architecture builds across 6 affected Dockerfiles, detailed root cause analysis, three solution options with code examples, clear acceptance criteria, implementation guidance following established multi-architecture patterns, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-22T07:30:12.760Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for GitHub Actions LVM setup failure during PR #1425 review, specifically addressing ext4 signature detection causing lvcreate to fail with interactive prompts. Issue #1434 was successfully created with comprehensive problem description covering stale filesystem signatures, interactive prompt failures, runner cleanup issues, disk space pressure, detailed technical analysis, multiple solution options (immediate signature wiping, robust pre-cleanup logic, enhanced runner cleanup, alternative volume strategies), clear acceptance criteria, implementation guidance, risk mitigation strategies, and proper context linking. This infrastructure issue is related to but distinct from existing Issue #1196 about fallocate failures in the same gha_lvm_overlay.sh script, continuing the established pattern of systematic infrastructure improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1306
File: jupyter/trustyai/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.cpu:132-134
Timestamp: 2025-07-08T19:07:58.135Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for Docker build robustness problem with rm glob patterns during PR #1306 review. Issue was created covering 11 affected Dockerfiles with fragile rm commands that fail on empty globs, comprehensive problem description, multiple solution options, acceptance criteria, implementation guidance, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-09T09:12:44.088Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for GitHub Actions artifact naming conflict during PR #1357 review, specifically for a failing actions/upload-artifactv4 step with 409 Conflict error. Issue was created with comprehensive problem description covering artifact naming conflicts, root cause analysis of duplicate names in concurrent workflows, four solution options (enhanced naming, overwriting, conditional uploads, matrix-aware naming) with code examples, detailed acceptance criteria, implementation guidance, testing approach, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic CI/CD and code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1269
File: codeserver/ubi9-python-3.12/run-code-server.sh:7-10
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T14:01:22.819Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for container startup robustness and lifecycle management improvements in codeserver/ubi9-python-3.12/run-code-server.sh during PR #1269 review. A comprehensive issue was created covering race conditions, failure detection, process lifecycle coupling, and signal handling with detailed problem descriptions, multiple solution options, phased acceptance criteria, testing approach, and proper context linking, following the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1333
File: runtimes/rocm-pytorch/ubi9-python-3.12/utils/bootstrapper.py:1-769
Timestamp: 2025-07-08T19:35:49.482Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for bootstrapper code duplication problem in runtimes/rocm-pytorch/ubi9-python-3.12/utils/bootstrapper.py during PR #1333 review. After an initial failed attempt, issue #1349 was successfully created with comprehensive problem description covering maintenance overhead and consistency risks from duplicate implementations across 5 Python 3.12 runtime environments, four solution options (symlinks, import-based, template-based, direct shared import) with pros/cons analysis, clear acceptance criteria for consolidation and maintainability, step-by-step implementation guidance, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1379
File: .tekton/odh-workbench-jupyter-datascience-cpu-py312-ubi9-push.yaml:14-17
Timestamp: 2025-07-11T11:15:47.424Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for CEL filter problem in datascience workbench Tekton pipelines during PR #1379 review. Issue #1383 was successfully created with comprehensive problem description covering both Python 3.11 and 3.12 pipelines incorrectly watching jupyter/minimal directories instead of jupyter/datascience directories, detailed impact analysis of pipeline execution failures, complete solution with before/after code examples, thorough acceptance criteria for path updates and pipeline triggering verification, implementation notes about repository structure alignment, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T12:44:00.167Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for smart-open library S3/GCS backend compatibility concern in PR #1269. Issue #1289 was successfully created with comprehensive problem description, acceptance criteria, implementation guidance, testing approach, and proper context linking, following the established pattern of systematic issue tracking for technical improvements.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T13:33:55.209Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for smart-open library S3/GCS backend compatibility concern in PR #1269. Issue #1296 was successfully created with comprehensive problem description, acceptance criteria, implementation guidance, testing approach, and proper context linking, following the established pattern of systematic issue tracking for technical improvements.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-01T17:35:29.175Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for adding pytorch+llmcompressor images to Makefile build targets during PR #1519 review. Issue #1598 was successfully created with comprehensive problem description covering missing build targets for both jupyter workbench and runtime images, detailed solution with specific Makefile code examples following established patterns, thorough acceptance criteria covering individual targets, BASE_DIRS variable inclusion, and all-images target integration, implementation notes about handling '+' characters in paths, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T12:44:00.167Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for smart-open library compatibility concern in PR #1269, specifically about potential S3/GCS backend functionality loss due to smart-open dropping implicit extras since version 6.x. Issue creation follows established pattern of comprehensive problem descriptions, acceptance criteria, implementation guidance, and proper context linking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T13:01:18.625Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for markdown linting improvements in PR #1269, specifically addressing MD014 violations in README files and suggesting repository-wide markdown linter integration. Issue #1290 was created with comprehensive tooling recommendations, implementation phases, acceptance criteria, and systematic approach to documentation quality improvements.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1269
File: codeserver/ubi9-python-3.12/run-code-server.sh:20-40
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T12:27:09.739Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for shell script error handling improvements in codeserver/ubi9-python-3.12/run-code-server.sh create_dir_and_file function during PR #1269 review. Issue #1284 was created with comprehensive problem description, acceptance criteria, implementation guidance, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1269
File: codeserver/ubi9-python-3.12/nginx/root/usr/share/container-scripts/nginx/common.sh:1-3
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T12:07:19.365Z
Learning: jiridanek consistently requests GitHub issue creation for technical improvements identified during code reviews in opendatahub-io/notebooks, ensuring systematic tracking of code quality enhancements like shell script portability issues with comprehensive descriptions, solution options, and acceptance criteria.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#968
File: codeserver/ubi9-python-3.11/Dockerfile.cpu:138-140
Timestamp: 2025-08-01T16:07:58.701Z
Learning: jiridanek prefers architectural solutions that eliminate problems entirely rather than just fixing immediate technical issues. When presented with a pipeline safety concern about micropipenv requirements generation, he suggested removing micropipenv from the build process altogether by using pre-committed requirements.txt files, demonstrating preference for simplification and deterministic builds over complex workarounds.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1600
File: Makefile:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T08:49:03.735Z
Learning: jiridanek decided to eliminate '+' characters entirely from Makefile target names during PR #1600 review instead of implementing complex substitution workarounds, demonstrating his consistent preference for architectural solutions that eliminate problems at the source rather than adding complexity to handle edge cases.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1269
File: codeserver/ubi9-python-3.12/utils/process.sh:17-19
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T14:00:00.909Z
Learning: jiridanek efficiently identifies when CodeRabbit review suggestions are already covered by existing comprehensive issues, demonstrating excellent issue management and avoiding duplicate tracking of the same improvements across multiple locations.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1151
File: jupyter/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/test/test_notebook.ipynb:31-34
Timestamp: 2025-07-01T07:03:05.385Z
Learning: jiridanek demonstrates excellent pattern recognition for identifying duplicated code issues across the opendatahub-io/notebooks repository. When spotting a potential problem in test notebooks, he correctly assesses that such patterns are likely replicated across multiple similar files rather than being isolated incidents, leading to more effective systematic solutions.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1259
File: jupyter/rocm/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.rocm:56-66
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T18:19:49.397Z
Learning: jiridanek consistently creates comprehensive follow-up GitHub issues for security concerns raised during PR reviews in opendatahub-io/notebooks, ensuring systematic tracking and resolution of supply-chain security improvements like GPG signature verification for package repositories.

[jiridanek]

@coderabbitai besides *.vsix files, what are the next two largest groups of content that take the most data?

[coderabbitai]

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check overall repository size
echo "=== Repository disk usage ==="
du -sh .

# Check size of .git directory
echo -e "\n=== Git directory size ==="
du -sh .git

# Find largest directories (top 20)
echo -e "\n=== Top 20 largest directories ==="
du -h --max-depth=3 . 2>/dev/null | sort -rh | head -20

# Find large files (over 1MB)
echo -e "\n=== Files larger than 1MB ==="
find . -type f -size +1M -exec ls -lh {} \; 2>/dev/null | awk '{print $9, $5}' | sort -k2 -rh | head -20

# Check git pack file sizes
echo -e "\n=== Git pack files ==="
find .git/objects/pack -type f -name "*.pack" -exec ls -lh {} \; 2>/dev/null

# Count total number of files
echo -e "\n=== Total file count ==="
find . -type f | wc -l

# Check for binary files
echo -e "\n=== Binary files in repository ==="
find . -type f -not -path "./.git/*" -exec file {} \; 2>/dev/null | grep -v "text" | head -20

Length of output: 2843

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# List the 20 largest objects in git history
echo "=== Largest objects in git history ==="
git rev-list --objects --all | \
  git cat-file --batch-check='%(objecttype) %(objectname) %(objectsize) %(rest)' | \
  sed -n 's/^blob //p' | \
  sort -rn -k2 | \
  head -20 | \
  while read hash size path; do
    echo "$(numfmt --to=iec --suffix=B $size) $path"
  done

# Check if these VSIX files have been in the repo for long
echo -e "\n=== History of VSIX files ==="
git log --oneline --follow -- "*.vsix" | head -20

# Check total number of commits
echo -e "\n=== Total number of commits ==="
git rev-list --count HEAD

# Check if there's a .gitattributes file for LFS
echo -e "\n=== Git LFS configuration ==="
if [ -f .gitattributes ]; then
  cat .gitattributes | grep -i lfs || echo "No LFS patterns found in .gitattributes"
else
  echo "No .gitattributes file found"
fi

# List all VSIX files currently in the repo
echo -e "\n=== All VSIX files in current repository ==="
find . -name "*.vsix" -type f -exec ls -lh {} \; | awk '{print $9, $5}'

Length of output: 6356

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if these VSIX files have been in the repo for long
echo "=== History of VSIX files (last 20 commits) ==="
git log --oneline -- "**/*.vsix" 2>/dev/null | head -20

# Check total number of commits
echo -e "\n=== Total number of commits ==="
git rev-list --count HEAD

# Check if there's a .gitattributes file
echo -e "\n=== Checking for .gitattributes ==="
if [ -f .gitattributes ]; then
  echo "Found .gitattributes:"
  cat .gitattributes
else
  echo "No .gitattributes file found"
fi

# List all VSIX files currently in the repo with sizes in MB
echo -e "\n=== All VSIX files currently in repository ==="
find . -name "*.vsix" -type f -exec ls -lh {} \; 2>/dev/null | while read perms links owner group size date time path; do
  echo "$path: $size"
done

# Count unique VSIX files in git history
echo -e "\n=== Unique VSIX files that have existed in git history ==="
git rev-list --objects --all | grep '\.vsix$' | awk '{print $2}' | sort -u | wc -l

# Show when VSIX files were first added
echo -e "\n=== First commits adding VSIX files ==="
git log --reverse --oneline --diff-filter=A -- "*.vsix" | head -10

# Check for other large binary file types
echo -e "\n=== Other potential large binary files ==="
find . -type f \( -name "*.jar" -o -name "*.zip" -o -name "*.tar.gz" -o -name "*.whl" -o -name "*.exe" -o -name "*.dmg" \) -exec ls -lh {} \; 2>/dev/null | while read perms links owner group size date time path; do
  echo "$path: $size"
done

Length of output: 4563

---

@jiridanek I've investigated the repository size issue. Here's what's causing the slow cloning:

Root Cause Analysis

The repository is 132MB total (41MB git history, 91MB working directory), which is indeed large for source code. The primary culprits are:

1. Binary VSIX Files (VS Code Extensions)

Currently storing 14 VSIX files totaling ~73MB in the working directory:

• ms-toolsai.jupyter-2025.2.0.vsix: 14MB each (x2 copies)
• ms-python.debugpy-2025.4.1@linux-x64.vsix: 8.6MB each (x2 copies)
• ms-toolsai.jupyter-renderers-1.1.0.vsix: 7.4MB each (x2 copies)
• ms-python.python-2025.2.0.vsix: 6.5MB each (x2 copies)

2. Duplication Across Python Versions

These files are duplicated in both codeserver/ubi9-python-3.11/utils/ and codeserver/ubi9-python-3.12/utils/, effectively doubling the storage requirement.

3. Historical Accumulation

The git history contains 19 unique VSIX files that have been added over time. Even deleted versions remain in the 37MB pack file, as binary files don't compress well with git's delta compression.

Recommended Solutions

Option 1: Download Extensions at Build Time (Recommended)

Instead of storing VSIX files in git, download them during the Docker build:

# In Dockerfile
RUN curl -L -o ms-toolsai.jupyter-2025.2.0.vsix \
    https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/_apis/public/gallery/publishers/ms-toolsai/vsextensions/jupyter/2025.2.0/vspackage

Option 2: Git LFS

Configure Git LFS for binary files:

*.vsix filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text

This would store binaries separately, allowing faster clones of the main repository.

Option 3: Deduplicate Files

Create a shared directory for VSIX files and symlink from Python-specific directories, reducing duplication.

Option 4: External Storage

Host VSIX files in a package registry, S3 bucket, or CDN, and fetch during builds.

Long-term: Clean Git History

Consider using git filter-repo or BFG Repo-Cleaner to remove historical VSIX files from git history, though this requires coordination as it rewrites history.

Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track implementing one of these solutions?

---

🧠 Learnings used

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1269
File: codeserver/ubi9-python-3.12/utils/process.sh:17-19
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T14:00:00.909Z
Learning: jiridanek efficiently identifies when CodeRabbit review suggestions are already covered by existing comprehensive issues, demonstrating excellent issue management and avoiding duplicate tracking of the same improvements across multiple locations.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1151
File: jupyter/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/test/test_notebook.ipynb:31-34
Timestamp: 2025-07-01T07:03:05.385Z
Learning: jiridanek demonstrates excellent pattern recognition for identifying duplicated code issues across the opendatahub-io/notebooks repository. When spotting a potential problem in test notebooks, he correctly assesses that such patterns are likely replicated across multiple similar files rather than being isolated incidents, leading to more effective systematic solutions.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1269
File: codeserver/ubi9-python-3.12/nginx/root/usr/share/container-scripts/nginx/common.sh:1-3
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T12:07:19.365Z
Learning: jiridanek consistently requests GitHub issue creation for technical improvements identified during code reviews in opendatahub-io/notebooks, ensuring systematic tracking of code quality enhancements like shell script portability issues with comprehensive descriptions, solution options, and acceptance criteria.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-22T06:02:15.056Z
Learning: jiridanek provided actual Trivy vulnerability report URL for PR #1425, validating the previously identified concern about exit-code: '0' configuration preventing security workflow failures. This demonstrates that the security scanning is successfully detecting vulnerabilities but not blocking CI due to the configuration issue raised in issue #1427.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1333
File: runtimes/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Pipfile:13-15
Timestamp: 2025-07-08T19:29:32.006Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for investigating TensorFlow "and-cuda" extras usage patterns during PR #1333 review. Issue #1345 was created with comprehensive investigation framework covering platform-specific analysis, deployment scenarios, TensorFlow version compatibility, clear acceptance criteria, and testing approach, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1259
File: jupyter/rocm/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.rocm:56-66
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T18:19:49.397Z
Learning: jiridanek consistently creates comprehensive follow-up GitHub issues for security concerns raised during PR reviews in opendatahub-io/notebooks, ensuring systematic tracking and resolution of supply-chain security improvements like GPG signature verification for package repositories.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1333
File: runtimes/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Pipfile:13-15
Timestamp: 2025-07-08T19:29:32.006Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for investigating TensorFlow "and-cuda" extras usage patterns during PR #1333 review. Issue #1340 was created with comprehensive investigation framework covering platform-specific analysis, deployment scenarios, TensorFlow version compatibility, clear acceptance criteria, testing approach, and implementation timeline, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1259
File: jupyter/rocm/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/test/test_notebook.ipynb:22-29
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T18:27:51.097Z
Learning: jiridanek consistently creates comprehensive follow-up GitHub issues from PR review comments in opendatahub-io/notebooks, turning specific code quality concerns into systematic improvements tracked with proper context, acceptance criteria, and cross-references. Issue #1266 demonstrates this pattern by expanding a specific error handling concern in load_expected_versions() into a repository-wide improvement initiative.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T13:33:55.209Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for smart-open library S3/GCS backend compatibility concern in PR #1269. Issue #1296 was successfully created with comprehensive problem description, acceptance criteria, implementation guidance, testing approach, and proper context linking, following the established pattern of systematic issue tracking for technical improvements.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1269
File: codeserver/ubi9-python-3.12/requirements.txt:435-444
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T13:59:55.040Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for numpy/scipy compatibility investigation in PR #1269, specifically for cases where theoretical version conflicts don't manifest as actual build failures. Issue #1297 was created with comprehensive investigation framework, acceptance criteria, runtime testing approach, and proper context linking, demonstrating the pattern of creating investigation-type issues for apparent but non-blocking technical concerns that require deeper understanding.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#968
File: codeserver/ubi9-python-3.11/Dockerfile.cpu:138-140
Timestamp: 2025-08-01T16:07:58.701Z
Learning: jiridanek prefers architectural solutions that eliminate problems entirely rather than just fixing immediate technical issues. When presented with a pipeline safety concern about micropipenv requirements generation, he suggested removing micropipenv from the build process altogether by using pre-committed requirements.txt files, demonstrating preference for simplification and deterministic builds over complex workarounds.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1600
File: Makefile:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T08:49:03.735Z
Learning: jiridanek decided to eliminate '+' characters entirely from Makefile target names during PR #1600 review instead of implementing complex substitution workarounds, demonstrating his consistent preference for architectural solutions that eliminate problems at the source rather than adding complexity to handle edge cases.

[coderabbitai]

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
echo "=== Repository Size Analysis (Excluding VSIX Files) ==="
echo

# Total size without .git and VSIX files
echo "1. Size breakdown by major directories:"
for dir in jupyter runtimes codeserver habana rstudio tests manifests ci .github .tekton; do
    if [ -d "$dir" ]; then
        # Get total size
        total_size=$(du -sh "$dir" 2>/dev/null | cut -f1)
        # Get size excluding VSIX
        vsix_size=$(find "$dir" -name "*.vsix" -exec du -ch {} + 2>/dev/null | grep total$ | cut -f1 || echo "0")
        echo "$dir: Total=$total_size (VSIX=$vsix_size)"
    fi
done
echo

# Find all file types and their cumulative sizes
echo "2. File types by total size (excluding .git and *.vsix):"
find . -type f -not -path "./.git/*" -not -name "*.vsix" -exec file --mime-type {} + 2>/dev/null | \
    awk -F: '{split($2, a, "/"); ext=a[2]; gsub(/^ +| +$/, "", ext); print $1, ext}' | \
    while read filepath filetype; do
        size=$(stat -c%s "$filepath" 2>/dev/null || stat -f%z "$filepath" 2>/dev/null || echo 0)
        echo "$filetype $size"
    done | \
    awk '{types[$1]+=$2} END {for (t in types) printf "%-30s %s\n", t, types[t]}' | \
    sort -k2 -rn | \
    head -20 | \
    while read type size; do
        echo "$type: $(numfmt --to=iec --suffix=B $size 2>/dev/null || echo "${size}B")"
    done
echo

# Find files by extension
echo "3. Top file extensions by cumulative size (excluding .git and *.vsix):"
find . -type f -not -path "./.git/*" -not -name "*.vsix" -print0 2>/dev/null | \
    while IFS= read -r -d '' file; do
        ext="${file##*.}"
        if [ "$ext" = "$file" ]; then
            ext="no_extension"
        fi
        size=$(stat -c%s "$file" 2>/dev/null || stat -f%z "$file" 2>/dev/null || echo 0)
        echo "$ext $size"
    done | \
    awk '{exts[$1]+=$2; count[$1]++} END {for (e in exts) printf "%s %d %d\n", e, exts[e], count[e]}' | \
    sort -k2 -rn | \
    head -20 | \
    while read ext total_size count; do
        echo ".$ext: $(numfmt --to=iec --suffix=B $total_size 2>/dev/null || echo "${total_size}B") (${count} files)"
    done
echo

# Check for Jupyter notebooks
echo "4. Jupyter notebook files analysis:"
notebook_count=$(find . -name "*.ipynb" -type f | wc -l)
notebook_size=$(find . -name "*.ipynb" -type f -exec du -ch {} + 2>/dev/null | grep total$ | cut -f1 || echo "0")
echo "Total notebooks: $notebook_count"
echo "Total size: $notebook_size"
echo "Largest notebooks:"
find . -name "*.ipynb" -type f -exec ls -lh {} \; 2>/dev/null | \
    awk '{print $9, $5}' | sort -k2 -rh | head -10
echo

# Check Python package files
echo "5. Python package/dependency files:"
echo "Pipfile/requirements.txt files:"
find . \( -name "Pipfile*" -o -name "requirements*.txt" -o -name "*.lock" \) -type f -exec ls -lh {} \; 2>/dev/null | \
    awk '{print $9, $5}' | sort -k2 -rh | head -10
echo

# Check documentation and text files
echo "6. Documentation files:"
doc_size=$(find . \( -name "*.md" -o -name "*.rst" -o -name "*.txt" -o -name "README*" \) -type f -not -path "./.git/*" -exec du -ch {} + 2>/dev/null | grep total$ | cut -f1 || echo "0")
doc_count=$(find . \( -name "*.md" -o -name "*.rst" -o -name "*.txt" -o -name "README*" \) -type f -not -path "./.git/*" | wc -l)
echo "Total documentation files: $doc_count"
echo "Total size: $doc_size"

Length of output: 203916

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
echo "=== Additional Analysis for Large Content ==="
echo

# Check for any other binary files
echo "1. Other binary/compiled files (excluding VSIX):"
find . -type f -not -path "./.git/*" -not -name "*.vsix" -exec file {} \; 2>/dev/null | \
    grep -E "(executable|binary|data|archive|compressed)" | \
    head -20 | \
    while IFS=: read filepath filetype; do
        size=$(ls -lh "$filepath" 2>/dev/null | awk '{print $5}')
        echo "$filepath: $size - $filetype"
    done
echo

# Shell scripts analysis
echo "2. Shell scripts analysis:"
shell_count=$(find . -name "*.sh" -type f | wc -l)
shell_size=$(find . -name "*.sh" -type f -exec du -ch {} + 2>/dev/null | grep total$ | cut -f1 || echo "0")
echo "Total shell scripts: $shell_count"
echo "Total size: $shell_size"
echo

# Dockerfile analysis
echo "3. Dockerfile analysis:"
dockerfile_count=$(find . -name "Dockerfile*" -type f | wc -l)
dockerfile_size=$(find . -name "Dockerfile*" -type f -exec du -ch {} + 2>/dev/null | grep total$ | cut -f1 || echo "0")
echo "Total Dockerfiles: $dockerfile_count"
echo "Total size: $dockerfile_size"
echo

# YAML files (manifests, CI configs)
echo "4. YAML configuration files:"
yaml_count=$(find . \( -name "*.yaml" -o -name "*.yml" \) -type f | wc -l)
yaml_size=$(find . \( -name "*.yaml" -o -name "*.yml" \) -type f -exec du -ch {} + 2>/dev/null | grep total$ | cut -f1 || echo "0")
echo "Total YAML files: $yaml_count"  
echo "Total size: $yaml_size"
echo

# Python source files
echo "5. Python source files:"
python_count=$(find . -name "*.py" -type f | wc -l)
python_size=$(find . -name "*.py" -type f -exec du -ch {} + 2>/dev/null | grep total$ | cut -f1 || echo "0")
echo "Total Python files: $python_count"
echo "Total size: $python_size"
echo

# Check git pack files details
echo "6. Git pack files (historical data):"
if [ -d ".git/objects/pack" ]; then
    pack_count=$(find .git/objects/pack -name "*.pack" | wc -l)
    pack_size=$(du -sh .git/objects/pack 2>/dev/null | cut -f1)
    echo "Pack files: $pack_count"
    echo "Total pack size: $pack_size"
fi

Length of output: 2085

---

@jiridanek, after the VSIX files (73MB), the next two largest groups of content in your repository are:

1. Python Dependency Files (~6.5MB combined)

• Pipfile.lock files: Multiple 300-600KB files, with the largest being:
  • jupyter/pytorch+llmcompressor/ubi9-python-3.11/Pipfile.lock: 608KB
  • runtimes/pytorch+llmcompressor/ubi9-python-3.11/Pipfile.lock: 519KB
  • Various TensorFlow and PyTorch lock files: 300-340KB each
• requirements.txt files: Generated from Pipfile.lock, some exceeding 300KB
• These contain complete dependency trees with hashes and are duplicated across Python versions

2. Documentation and Text Files (6.6MB total)

• 72 files including README.md, various .txt files, and documentation
• This seems unusually high - likely includes the large requirements.txt files counted here too

3. Git History (41MB - not in working directory but affects clone size)

• 6 pack files containing compressed historical versions of all files
• Particularly problematic because it contains old versions of the VSIX files and other binaries

💡 Optimization Opportunities:

1. For Pipfile.lock files:

   • Consider if all lock files need to be committed (vs generating at build time)
   • These are text files so they compress well in git, but still add bulk

2. For Git History:

   • Run git filter-repo or BFG to remove historical VSIX files
   • This would reduce clone size by ~40MB but requires coordination (rewrites history)

3. General:

   • The real issue is the multiplication effect - files duplicated across Python 3.11/3.12 versions
   • Consider consolidating where possible or using symlinks for identical files

The VSIX files remain the primary issue at 73MB, but these dependency files and git history are the next significant contributors to your repository's size.

---

🧠 Learnings used

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1333
File: runtimes/rocm-pytorch/ubi9-python-3.12/utils/bootstrapper.py:1-769
Timestamp: 2025-07-08T19:35:49.482Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for bootstrapper code duplication problem in runtimes/rocm-pytorch/ubi9-python-3.12/utils/bootstrapper.py during PR #1333 review. After an initial failed attempt, issue #1349 was successfully created with comprehensive problem description covering maintenance overhead and consistency risks from duplicate implementations across 5 Python 3.12 runtime environments, four solution options (symlinks, import-based, template-based, direct shared import) with pros/cons analysis, clear acceptance criteria for consolidation and maintainability, step-by-step implementation guidance, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1320
File: jupyter/pytorch/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.cuda:65-66
Timestamp: 2025-07-09T12:31:02.033Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for MSSQL repo file hardcoding problem during PR #1320 review. Issue #1363 was created and updated with comprehensive problem description covering hardcoded x86_64 MSSQL repo files breaking multi-architecture builds across 10 affected Dockerfiles (including datascience, CUDA, ROCm, and TrustyAI variants), detailed root cause analysis, three solution options with code examples, clear acceptance criteria for all image types, implementation guidance following established multi-architecture patterns, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-22T07:30:12.760Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for GitHub Actions LVM setup failure during PR #1425 review, specifically addressing ext4 signature detection causing lvcreate to fail with interactive prompts. Issue #1434 was successfully created with comprehensive problem description covering stale filesystem signatures, interactive prompt failures, runner cleanup issues, disk space pressure, detailed technical analysis, multiple solution options (immediate signature wiping, robust pre-cleanup logic, enhanced runner cleanup, alternative volume strategies), clear acceptance criteria, implementation guidance, risk mitigation strategies, and proper context linking. This infrastructure issue is related to but distinct from existing Issue #1196 about fallocate failures in the same gha_lvm_overlay.sh script, continuing the established pattern of systematic infrastructure improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1269
File: codeserver/ubi9-python-3.12/run-code-server.sh:7-10
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T14:01:22.819Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for container startup robustness and lifecycle management improvements in codeserver/ubi9-python-3.12/run-code-server.sh during PR #1269 review. A comprehensive issue was created covering race conditions, failure detection, process lifecycle coupling, and signal handling with detailed problem descriptions, multiple solution options, phased acceptance criteria, testing approach, and proper context linking, following the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1320
File: jupyter/pytorch/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.cuda:65-66
Timestamp: 2025-07-09T12:31:02.033Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for MSSQL repo file hardcoding problem during PR #1320 review. Issue #1357 was created with comprehensive problem description covering hardcoded x86_64 MSSQL repo files breaking multi-architecture builds across 6 affected Dockerfiles, detailed root cause analysis, three solution options with code examples, clear acceptance criteria, implementation guidance following established multi-architecture patterns, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1365
File: .github/workflows/insta-merge.yaml:1-1
Timestamp: 2025-07-09T14:41:52.874Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for YAML linting problems caused by the new GitHub Actions workflow in PR #1365, specifically addressing failures in the repository's YAML linter due to the insta-merge.yaml workflow file. Issue was created with comprehensive problem description covering potential indentation, quoting, line length, and structural issues, detailed root cause analysis, four solution options (fixing current file, implementing linting rules, automated formatting, repository-wide standardization), clear acceptance criteria, implementation guidance with testing approach, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1365
File: .github/workflows/insta-merge.yaml:1-1
Timestamp: 2025-07-09T14:41:52.874Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for YAML linting problems caused by the new GitHub Actions workflow in PR #1365, specifically addressing failures in the repository's YAML linter due to the insta-merge.yaml workflow file. Issue #1370 was successfully created with comprehensive problem description covering potential indentation, quoting, line length, and structural issues, detailed root cause analysis, four solution options (fixing current file, implementing linting rules, automated formatting, repository-wide standardization), clear acceptance criteria, implementation guidance with testing approach, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1269
File: codeserver/ubi9-python-3.12/run-code-server.sh:7-10
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T14:01:22.819Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for container startup robustness and lifecycle management improvements in codeserver/ubi9-python-3.12/run-code-server.sh during PR #1269 review. Issue #1298 was successfully created with comprehensive problem description covering race conditions, failure detection, orphaned processes, and signal handling, along with multiple solution options, phased acceptance criteria, testing approach, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1306
File: jupyter/trustyai/ubi9-python-3.12/test/test_notebook.ipynb:71-76
Timestamp: 2025-07-04T06:04:43.085Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for duplicate CSV loading and validation problem in jupyter/trustyai/ubi9-python-3.12/test/test_notebook.ipynb during PR #1306 review. Issue #1322 was created with comprehensive problem description covering code redundancy, runtime failure risks, network inefficiency, and test reliability concerns, along with detailed solution including duplicate line removal, data validation implementation, repository-wide audit, acceptance criteria, implementation guidance, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1521
File: tests/containers/workbenches/jupyterlab/jupyterlab_test.py:61-68
Timestamp: 2025-08-01T09:33:23.033Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for improving architecture detection efficiency and centralization in JupyterLab tests during PR #1521 review. Issue #1576 was successfully created covering performance inefficiency of current container start/stop approach for architecture detection, need for centralized configuration of architecture-specific limitations, comprehensive solution options including session caching and helper functions, detailed acceptance criteria covering performance and maintainability requirements, phased implementation guidance, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1379
File: .tekton/odh-workbench-jupyter-datascience-cpu-py312-ubi9-push.yaml:14-17
Timestamp: 2025-07-11T11:15:47.424Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for CEL filter problem in datascience workbench Tekton pipelines during PR #1379 review. Issue #1383 was successfully created with comprehensive problem description covering both Python 3.11 and 3.12 pipelines incorrectly watching jupyter/minimal directories instead of jupyter/datascience directories, detailed impact analysis of pipeline execution failures, complete solution with before/after code examples, thorough acceptance criteria for path updates and pipeline triggering verification, implementation notes about repository structure alignment, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#968
File: runtimes/rocm-tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.rocm:17-18
Timestamp: 2025-08-06T15:22:17.997Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for micropipenv removal from Python 3.12 images during PR #968 review. Analysis revealed 15 affected Dockerfiles with only 1 legitimate usage (jupyter/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.cuda using micropipenv install --dev) while 14 images install micropipenv unnecessarily. Issue #1685 was created with comprehensive problem description covering ~238MB total waste across unused installations, detailed scope analysis, multiple solution options, clear acceptance criteria, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1306
File: jupyter/trustyai/ubi9-python-3.12/kustomize/base/kustomization.yaml:8-12
Timestamp: 2025-07-08T19:09:48.746Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for misleading CUDA prefix in TrustyAI image tags during PR #1306 review. Issue was created with comprehensive problem description covering both Python 3.11 and 3.12 versions, repository pattern analysis showing correct vs incorrect naming, clear solution with code examples, detailed acceptance criteria, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1333
File: runtimes/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Pipfile:13-15
Timestamp: 2025-07-08T19:29:32.006Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for investigating TensorFlow "and-cuda" extras usage patterns during PR #1333 review. Issue #1340 was created with comprehensive investigation framework covering platform-specific analysis, deployment scenarios, TensorFlow version compatibility, clear acceptance criteria, testing approach, and implementation timeline, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1306
File: jupyter/trustyai/ubi9-python-3.12/kustomize/base/kustomization.yaml:8-12
Timestamp: 2025-07-08T19:09:48.746Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for misleading CUDA prefix in TrustyAI image tags during PR #1306 review, affecting both Python 3.11 and 3.12 versions. Issue #1338 was created with comprehensive problem description covering both affected images, repository pattern analysis comparing correct vs incorrect naming conventions, clear solution with code examples, detailed acceptance criteria, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1306
File: jupyter/trustyai/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.cpu:132-134
Timestamp: 2025-07-08T19:07:58.135Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for Docker build robustness problem with rm glob patterns during PR #1306 review. Issue was created covering 11 affected Dockerfiles with fragile rm commands that fail on empty globs, comprehensive problem description, multiple solution options, acceptance criteria, implementation guidance, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1259
File: jupyter/rocm/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/test/test_notebook.ipynb:22-29
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T18:27:51.097Z
Learning: jiridanek consistently creates comprehensive follow-up GitHub issues from PR review comments in opendatahub-io/notebooks, turning specific code quality concerns into systematic improvements tracked with proper context, acceptance criteria, and cross-references. Issue #1266 demonstrates this pattern by expanding a specific error handling concern in load_expected_versions() into a repository-wide improvement initiative.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1269
File: codeserver/ubi9-python-3.12/nginx/root/usr/share/container-scripts/nginx/common.sh:1-3
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T12:07:19.365Z
Learning: jiridanek consistently requests GitHub issue creation for technical improvements identified during code reviews in opendatahub-io/notebooks, ensuring systematic tracking of code quality enhancements like shell script portability issues with comprehensive descriptions, solution options, and acceptance criteria.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#968
File: codeserver/ubi9-python-3.11/Dockerfile.cpu:138-140
Timestamp: 2025-08-01T16:07:58.701Z
Learning: jiridanek prefers architectural solutions that eliminate problems entirely rather than just fixing immediate technical issues. When presented with a pipeline safety concern about micropipenv requirements generation, he suggested removing micropipenv from the build process altogether by using pre-committed requirements.txt files, demonstrating preference for simplification and deterministic builds over complex workarounds.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1600
File: Makefile:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T08:49:03.735Z
Learning: jiridanek decided to eliminate '+' characters entirely from Makefile target names during PR #1600 review instead of implementing complex substitution workarounds, demonstrating his consistent preference for architectural solutions that eliminate problems at the source rather than adding complexity to handle edge cases.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1269
File: codeserver/ubi9-python-3.12/utils/process.sh:17-19
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T14:00:00.909Z
Learning: jiridanek efficiently identifies when CodeRabbit review suggestions are already covered by existing comprehensive issues, demonstrating excellent issue management and avoiding duplicate tracking of the same improvements across multiple locations.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1151
File: jupyter/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/test/test_notebook.ipynb:31-34
Timestamp: 2025-07-01T07:03:05.385Z
Learning: jiridanek demonstrates excellent pattern recognition for identifying duplicated code issues across the opendatahub-io/notebooks repository. When spotting a potential problem in test notebooks, he correctly assesses that such patterns are likely replicated across multiple similar files rather than being isolated incidents, leading to more effective systematic solutions.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1259
File: jupyter/rocm/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.rocm:56-66
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T18:19:49.397Z
Learning: jiridanek consistently creates comprehensive follow-up GitHub issues for security concerns raised during PR reviews in opendatahub-io/notebooks, ensuring systematic tracking and resolution of supply-chain security improvements like GPG signature verification for package repositories.

[coderabbitai]

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
echo "=== Repository Size Analysis (Excluding VSIX Files) ==="
echo

# 1. Get size breakdown by file extension (excluding VSIX)
echo "1. Top 20 file types by total size (excluding .vsix):"
find . -type f ! -name "*.vsix" -exec du -b {} + | \
  awk '{
    match($2, /\.[^.\/]+$/, ext)
    if (ext[0] == "") ext[0] = "no_extension"
    size[ext[0]] += $1
    count[ext[0]]++
  }
  END {
    for (e in size) 
      printf "%s\t%d\t%d\n", e, size[e], count[e]
  }' | \
  sort -t$'\t' -k2 -rn | \
  head -20 | \
  while IFS=$'\t' read ext size count; do
    printf "%-20s %10s (%d files)\n" "$ext" "$(numfmt --to=iec-i --suffix=B $size)" "$count"
  done
echo

# 2. Find all files larger than 500KB (excluding VSIX)
echo "2. Individual files larger than 500KB (excluding .vsix):"
find . -type f -size +500k ! -name "*.vsix" -exec ls -lh {} \; 2>/dev/null | \
  awk '{print $9, $5}' | sort -k2 -rh | head -20
echo

# 3. Analyze specific directories that might contain large content
echo "3. Size of key directories (excluding .git and .vsix files):"
for dir in jupyter runtimes codeserver manifests tests ci .github; do
  if [ -d "$dir" ]; then
    size=$(find "$dir" -type f ! -name "*.vsix" -exec du -cb {} + 2>/dev/null | grep total | awk '{print $1}')
    if [ -n "$size" ]; then
      printf "%-20s %s\n" "$dir/" "$(numfmt --to=iec-i --suffix=B $size)"
    fi
  fi
done
echo

# 4. Look for common binary/media file types
echo "4. Binary and media files in the repository:"
echo "Images (PNG, JPG, JPEG, GIF, SVG, ICO):"
find . -type f \( -iname "*.png" -o -iname "*.jpg" -o -iname "*.jpeg" -o -iname "*.gif" -o -iname "*.svg" -o -iname "*.ico" \) -exec du -ch {} + 2>/dev/null | grep total
echo "Archives (ZIP, TAR, GZ, BZ2):"
find . -type f \( -iname "*.zip" -o -iname "*.tar" -o -iname "*.gz" -o -iname "*.bz2" -o -iname "*.tar.gz" \) -exec du -ch {} + 2>/dev/null | grep total
echo "Fonts (TTF, OTF, WOFF, WOFF2, EOT):"
find . -type f \( -iname "*.ttf" -o -iname "*.otf" -o -iname "*.woff" -o -iname "*.woff2" -o -iname "*.eot" \) -exec du -ch {} + 2>/dev/null | grep total
echo "Data files (CSV, JSON, XML, PARQUET):"
find . -type f \( -iname "*.csv" -o -iname "*.json" -o -iname "*.xml" -o -iname "*.parquet" \) -exec du -ch {} + 2>/dev/null | grep total
echo

# 5. Check for Jupyter notebook files
echo "5. Jupyter notebook files analysis:"
find . -name "*.ipynb" -type f -exec du -ch {} + 2>/dev/null | grep total
echo "Largest notebooks:"
find . -name "*.ipynb" -type f -exec ls -lh {} \; 2>/dev/null | awk '{print $9, $5}' | sort -k2 -rh | head -10
echo

# 6. Look at git objects to find what's consuming space in history
echo "6. Largest files in git history (excluding .vsix):"
git rev-list --objects --all | \
  git cat-file --batch-check='%(objecttype) %(objectname) %(objectsize) %(rest)' | \
  sed -n 's/^blob //p' | \
  grep -v '\.vsix$' | \
  sort -n -k2 -r | \
  head -15 | \
  while read size path; do
    if [ -n "$path" ]; then
      echo "$(numfmt --to=iec-i --suffix=B $size) $path"
    fi
  done

Length of output: 17790

---

@jiridanek, after analyzing the repository (excluding VSIX files), the next two largest groups of content are:

📦 Next Largest Content Groups

1. Pipfile.lock Files (~8.2MB)

• 32 lock files containing exact Python dependency versions and hashes
• Largest examples:
  • jupyter/pytorch+llmcompressor/ubi9-python-3.11/Pipfile.lock (608KB)
  • runtimes/pytorch+llmcompressor/ubi9-python-3.11/Pipfile.lock (519KB)
  • Multiple TensorFlow and TrustyAI lock files (~340KB each)

2. requirements.txt Files (~6.5MB)

• 44 requirements files with Python package specifications
• Notable large files:
  • jupyter/pytorch+llmcompressor/ubi9-python-3.11/requirements.txt (395KB)
  • Multiple requirements files across jupyter and runtime directories

💡 Optimization Opportunities

For Pipfile.lock Files:

1. Consider gitignoring them - Regenerate during build from Pipfile
2. Deduplicate common dependencies - Many images share similar base packages
3. Use a centralized dependency management approach

For requirements.txt Files:

1. Split into base + specific requirements to reduce duplication
2. Use constraints files for version pinning instead of duplicating versions
3. Consider using a package proxy/cache during builds

Additional Finding:

Git pack files (.pack) in history contain 40MB of data, suggesting the repository would benefit from history cleanup using git-filter-repo or BFG Repo-Cleaner to remove old versions of these large text files.

These optimizations combined with the VSIX solution could reduce repository size by ~70% (from 132MB to ~40MB).

---

🧠 Learnings used

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1333
File: runtimes/rocm-pytorch/ubi9-python-3.12/utils/bootstrapper.py:1-769
Timestamp: 2025-07-08T19:35:49.482Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for bootstrapper code duplication problem in runtimes/rocm-pytorch/ubi9-python-3.12/utils/bootstrapper.py during PR #1333 review. After an initial failed attempt, issue #1349 was successfully created with comprehensive problem description covering maintenance overhead and consistency risks from duplicate implementations across 5 Python 3.12 runtime environments, four solution options (symlinks, import-based, template-based, direct shared import) with pros/cons analysis, clear acceptance criteria for consolidation and maintainability, step-by-step implementation guidance, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1320
File: jupyter/pytorch/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.cuda:65-66
Timestamp: 2025-07-09T12:31:02.033Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for MSSQL repo file hardcoding problem during PR #1320 review. Issue #1363 was created and updated with comprehensive problem description covering hardcoded x86_64 MSSQL repo files breaking multi-architecture builds across 10 affected Dockerfiles (including datascience, CUDA, ROCm, and TrustyAI variants), detailed root cause analysis, three solution options with code examples, clear acceptance criteria for all image types, implementation guidance following established multi-architecture patterns, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-22T07:30:12.760Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for GitHub Actions LVM setup failure during PR #1425 review, specifically addressing ext4 signature detection causing lvcreate to fail with interactive prompts. Issue #1434 was successfully created with comprehensive problem description covering stale filesystem signatures, interactive prompt failures, runner cleanup issues, disk space pressure, detailed technical analysis, multiple solution options (immediate signature wiping, robust pre-cleanup logic, enhanced runner cleanup, alternative volume strategies), clear acceptance criteria, implementation guidance, risk mitigation strategies, and proper context linking. This infrastructure issue is related to but distinct from existing Issue #1196 about fallocate failures in the same gha_lvm_overlay.sh script, continuing the established pattern of systematic infrastructure improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1269
File: codeserver/ubi9-python-3.12/run-code-server.sh:7-10
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T14:01:22.819Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for container startup robustness and lifecycle management improvements in codeserver/ubi9-python-3.12/run-code-server.sh during PR #1269 review. A comprehensive issue was created covering race conditions, failure detection, process lifecycle coupling, and signal handling with detailed problem descriptions, multiple solution options, phased acceptance criteria, testing approach, and proper context linking, following the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1320
File: jupyter/pytorch/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.cuda:65-66
Timestamp: 2025-07-09T12:31:02.033Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for MSSQL repo file hardcoding problem during PR #1320 review. Issue #1357 was created with comprehensive problem description covering hardcoded x86_64 MSSQL repo files breaking multi-architecture builds across 6 affected Dockerfiles, detailed root cause analysis, three solution options with code examples, clear acceptance criteria, implementation guidance following established multi-architecture patterns, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1365
File: .github/workflows/insta-merge.yaml:1-1
Timestamp: 2025-07-09T14:41:52.874Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for YAML linting problems caused by the new GitHub Actions workflow in PR #1365, specifically addressing failures in the repository's YAML linter due to the insta-merge.yaml workflow file. Issue was created with comprehensive problem description covering potential indentation, quoting, line length, and structural issues, detailed root cause analysis, four solution options (fixing current file, implementing linting rules, automated formatting, repository-wide standardization), clear acceptance criteria, implementation guidance with testing approach, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1365
File: .github/workflows/insta-merge.yaml:1-1
Timestamp: 2025-07-09T14:41:52.874Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for YAML linting problems caused by the new GitHub Actions workflow in PR #1365, specifically addressing failures in the repository's YAML linter due to the insta-merge.yaml workflow file. Issue #1370 was successfully created with comprehensive problem description covering potential indentation, quoting, line length, and structural issues, detailed root cause analysis, four solution options (fixing current file, implementing linting rules, automated formatting, repository-wide standardization), clear acceptance criteria, implementation guidance with testing approach, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1269
File: codeserver/ubi9-python-3.12/run-code-server.sh:7-10
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T14:01:22.819Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for container startup robustness and lifecycle management improvements in codeserver/ubi9-python-3.12/run-code-server.sh during PR #1269 review. Issue #1298 was successfully created with comprehensive problem description covering race conditions, failure detection, orphaned processes, and signal handling, along with multiple solution options, phased acceptance criteria, testing approach, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1306
File: jupyter/trustyai/ubi9-python-3.12/test/test_notebook.ipynb:71-76
Timestamp: 2025-07-04T06:04:43.085Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for duplicate CSV loading and validation problem in jupyter/trustyai/ubi9-python-3.12/test/test_notebook.ipynb during PR #1306 review. Issue #1322 was created with comprehensive problem description covering code redundancy, runtime failure risks, network inefficiency, and test reliability concerns, along with detailed solution including duplicate line removal, data validation implementation, repository-wide audit, acceptance criteria, implementation guidance, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1521
File: tests/containers/workbenches/jupyterlab/jupyterlab_test.py:61-68
Timestamp: 2025-08-01T09:33:23.033Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for improving architecture detection efficiency and centralization in JupyterLab tests during PR #1521 review. Issue #1576 was successfully created covering performance inefficiency of current container start/stop approach for architecture detection, need for centralized configuration of architecture-specific limitations, comprehensive solution options including session caching and helper functions, detailed acceptance criteria covering performance and maintainability requirements, phased implementation guidance, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1379
File: .tekton/odh-workbench-jupyter-datascience-cpu-py312-ubi9-push.yaml:14-17
Timestamp: 2025-07-11T11:15:47.424Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for CEL filter problem in datascience workbench Tekton pipelines during PR #1379 review. Issue #1383 was successfully created with comprehensive problem description covering both Python 3.11 and 3.12 pipelines incorrectly watching jupyter/minimal directories instead of jupyter/datascience directories, detailed impact analysis of pipeline execution failures, complete solution with before/after code examples, thorough acceptance criteria for path updates and pipeline triggering verification, implementation notes about repository structure alignment, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#968
File: runtimes/rocm-tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.rocm:17-18
Timestamp: 2025-08-06T15:22:17.997Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for micropipenv removal from Python 3.12 images during PR #968 review. Analysis revealed 15 affected Dockerfiles with only 1 legitimate usage (jupyter/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.cuda using micropipenv install --dev) while 14 images install micropipenv unnecessarily. Issue #1685 was created with comprehensive problem description covering ~238MB total waste across unused installations, detailed scope analysis, multiple solution options, clear acceptance criteria, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-11T11:16:05.131Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for RStudio py311 Tekton push pipelines during PR #1379 review. Issue #1384 was successfully created covering two RStudio variants (CPU and CUDA) found in manifests/base/params-latest.env, with comprehensive problem description, implementation requirements following the same pattern as other workbench pipelines, clear acceptance criteria, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1259
File: jupyter/rocm/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/test/test_notebook.ipynb:22-29
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T18:27:51.097Z
Learning: jiridanek consistently creates comprehensive follow-up GitHub issues from PR review comments in opendatahub-io/notebooks, turning specific code quality concerns into systematic improvements tracked with proper context, acceptance criteria, and cross-references. Issue #1266 demonstrates this pattern by expanding a specific error handling concern in load_expected_versions() into a repository-wide improvement initiative.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-11T11:16:05.131Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for adding RStudio py311 Tekton push pipelines during PR #1379 review, referencing existing registry entries in manifests/base/params-latest.env but missing corresponding .tekton pipeline files. A comprehensive issue was created with detailed problem description, implementation requirements following the same pattern as other workbench pipelines, clear acceptance criteria, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-01T17:35:29.175Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for adding pytorch+llmcompressor images to Makefile build targets during PR #1519 review. Issue #1598 was successfully created with comprehensive problem description covering missing build targets for both jupyter workbench and runtime images, detailed solution with specific Makefile code examples following established patterns, thorough acceptance criteria covering individual targets, BASE_DIRS variable inclusion, and all-images target integration, implementation notes about handling '+' characters in paths, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1269
File: codeserver/ubi9-python-3.12/nginx/root/usr/share/container-scripts/nginx/common.sh:1-3
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T12:07:19.365Z
Learning: jiridanek consistently requests GitHub issue creation for technical improvements identified during code reviews in opendatahub-io/notebooks, ensuring systematic tracking of code quality enhancements like shell script portability issues with comprehensive descriptions, solution options, and acceptance criteria.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-01T14:46:03.215Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for two nitpicks during PR #1588 review: comment wording improvement in ROCm TensorFlow Dockerfile and typo fix in Jupyter DataScience Dockerfile stage header. Issues #1589 and #1590 were successfully created with comprehensive problem descriptions, specific file locations and line numbers, clear before/after solutions, detailed acceptance criteria, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1379
File: .tekton/odh-workbench-jupyter-pytorch-cuda-py312-ubi9-push.yaml:40-44
Timestamp: 2025-07-11T11:15:25.572Z
Learning: jiridanek requested GitHub issue creation for critical Tekton array parameter syntax error during PR #1379 review, affecting all 32 pipeline files with additional-tags parameter. Issue #1382 was created with comprehensive problem description covering both Python 3.11 and 3.12 pipeline files (16 each), detailed root cause analysis of value: vs values: syntax error, critical impact assessment of complete pipeline execution failure, complete list of all affected files across workbench and runtime types, implementation commands with sed scripts, detailed acceptance criteria, implementation notes about systematic copy-paste error propagation, and proper context linking, continuing the established pattern of systematic code quality improvements through detailed issue tracking.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#968
File: codeserver/ubi9-python-3.11/Dockerfile.cpu:138-140
Timestamp: 2025-08-01T16:07:58.701Z
Learning: jiridanek prefers architectural solutions that eliminate problems entirely rather than just fixing immediate technical issues. When presented with a pipeline safety concern about micropipenv requirements generation, he suggested removing micropipenv from the build process altogether by using pre-committed requirements.txt files, demonstrating preference for simplification and deterministic builds over complex workarounds.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1600
File: Makefile:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T08:49:03.735Z
Learning: jiridanek decided to eliminate '+' characters entirely from Makefile target names during PR #1600 review instead of implementing complex substitution workarounds, demonstrating his consistent preference for architectural solutions that eliminate problems at the source rather than adding complexity to handle edge cases.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1269
File: codeserver/ubi9-python-3.12/utils/process.sh:17-19
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T14:00:00.909Z
Learning: jiridanek efficiently identifies when CodeRabbit review suggestions are already covered by existing comprehensive issues, demonstrating excellent issue management and avoiding duplicate tracking of the same improvements across multiple locations.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1151
File: jupyter/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/test/test_notebook.ipynb:31-34
Timestamp: 2025-07-01T07:03:05.385Z
Learning: jiridanek demonstrates excellent pattern recognition for identifying duplicated code issues across the opendatahub-io/notebooks repository. When spotting a potential problem in test notebooks, he correctly assesses that such patterns are likely replicated across multiple similar files rather than being isolated incidents, leading to more effective systematic solutions.

---

Learnt from: jiridanek
PR: opendatahub-io/notebooks#1259
File: jupyter/rocm/tensorflow/ubi9-python-3.12/Dockerfile.rocm:56-66
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T18:19:49.397Z
Learning: jiridanek consistently creates comprehensive follow-up GitHub issues for security concerns raised during PR reviews in opendatahub-io/notebooks, ensuring systematic tracking and resolution of supply-chain security improvements like GPG signature verification for package repositories.