Skip to content

feat: remove lib v2 beta badge#2951

Open
rpenido wants to merge 1 commit intoopenedx:masterfrom
open-craft:rpenido/fal-4334/remove-libraryv2-beta
Open

feat: remove lib v2 beta badge#2951
rpenido wants to merge 1 commit intoopenedx:masterfrom
open-craft:rpenido/fal-4334/remove-libraryv2-beta

Conversation

@rpenido
Copy link
Contributor

@rpenido rpenido commented Mar 20, 2026

Description

This PR removes the Beta badge from the Libraries tab.

Before

image

After

image
  • Which user roles will this change impact?
    "Course Author"

Supporting information

Testing instructions

  • Open the course authoring main page and check that the badge was removed.

Best Practices Checklist

We're trying to move away from some deprecated patterns in this codebase. Please
check if your PR meets these recommendations before asking for a review:

  • Any new files are using TypeScript (.ts, .tsx).
  • Avoid propTypes and defaultProps in any new or modified code.
  • Tests should use the helpers in src/testUtils.tsx (specifically initializeMocks)
  • Do not add new fields to the Redux state/store. Use React Context to share state among multiple components.
  • Use React Query to load data from REST APIs. See any apiHooks.ts in this repo for examples.
  • All new i18n messages in messages.ts files have a description for translators to use.
  • Avoid using ../ in import paths. To import from parent folders, use @src, e.g. import { initializeMocks } from '@src/testUtils'; instead of from '../../../../testUtils'

Private ref: [FAL-4334](https://tasks.opencraft.com/browse/FAL-4334]

@openedx-webhooks openedx-webhooks added the open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U label Mar 20, 2026
@openedx-webhooks
Copy link

openedx-webhooks commented Mar 20, 2026

Thanks for the pull request, @rpenido!

This repository is currently maintained by @bradenmacdonald.

Once you've gone through the following steps feel free to tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for engineering review.

🔘 Get product approval

If you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.

  • If it does, you'll need to submit a product proposal for your contribution, and have it reviewed by the Product Working Group.
    • This process (including the steps you'll need to take) is documented here.
  • If it doesn't, simply proceed with the next step.
🔘 Provide context

To help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:

  • Dependencies

    This PR must be merged before / after / at the same time as ...

  • Blockers

    This PR is waiting for OEP-1234 to be accepted.

  • Timeline information

    This PR must be merged by XX date because ...

  • Partner information

    This is for a course on edx.org.

  • Supporting documentation
  • Relevant Open edX discussion forum threads
🔘 Get a green build

If one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green.

Details
Where can I find more information?

If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:

When can I expect my changes to be merged?

Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible.

However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:

  • The size and impact of the changes that it introduces
  • The need for product review
  • Maintenance status of the parent repository

💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Needs Triage in Contributions Mar 20, 2026
@rpenido rpenido force-pushed the rpenido/fal-4334/remove-libraryv2-beta branch 2 times, most recently from 11436f0 to d070b23 Compare March 20, 2026 12:37
@rpenido rpenido force-pushed the rpenido/fal-4334/remove-libraryv2-beta branch from d070b23 to a821ac7 Compare March 20, 2026 12:48
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 20, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.51%. Comparing base (4d5c583) to head (a821ac7).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           master    #2951    +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage   95.51%   95.51%            
========================================
  Files        1330     1330            
  Lines       30582    30582            
  Branches     6716     6927   +211     
========================================
  Hits        29211    29211            
+ Misses       1315     1303    -12     
- Partials       56       68    +12     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@rpenido rpenido marked this pull request as ready for review March 20, 2026 13:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U

Projects

Status: Needs Triage

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants