feat: add support for origin server and user info (#2663)

[dwong2708]

Backports of #2663 to Ulmo

Resolves: #2596

This PR introduces the following improvements:

• Display of the number of sections, subsections, and units.
• Display of the instance name where the archive was created.
• Display of the email of the user who generated the archive.

Before:

Now:

Where can I find this section?

This UI appears when creating a new V2 library using the “Create from archive” option.

Testing instructions

1. Create a new V2 library.
2. Select the Create from archive option.
3. Upload a backup archive .zip file.
4. Review the summary section and confirm the displayed information.

Other information

Related backend PR: openedx/edx-platform#37626

Best Practices Checklist

We're trying to move away from some deprecated patterns in this codebase. Please
check if your PR meets these recommendations before asking for a review:

• Any new files are using TypeScript (.ts, .tsx).
• Avoid propTypes and defaultProps in any new or modified code.
• Tests should use the helpers in src/testUtils.tsx (specifically initializeMocks)
• Do not add new fields to the Redux state/store. Use React Context to share state among multiple components.
• Use React Query to load data from REST APIs. See any apiHooks.ts in this repo for examples.
• All new i18n messages in messages.ts files have a description for translators to use.
• Avoid using ../ in import paths. To import from parent folders, use @src, e.g. import { initializeMocks } from '@src/testUtils'; instead of from '../../../../testUtils'

[openedx-webhooks]

Thanks for the pull request, @dwong2708!

This repository is currently maintained by @bradenmacdonald.

Once you've gone through the following steps feel free to tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for engineering review.

🔘 Get product approval

If you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.

• If it does, you'll need to submit a product proposal for your contribution, and have it reviewed by the Product Working Group.
  • This process (including the steps you'll need to take) is documented here.
• If it doesn't, simply proceed with the next step.

🔘 Provide context

To help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:

• Dependencies

  This PR must be merged before / after / at the same time as ...

• Blockers

  This PR is waiting for OEP-1234 to be accepted.

• Timeline information

  This PR must be merged by XX date because ...

• Partner information

  This is for a course on edx.org.

• Supporting documentation
• Relevant Open edX discussion forum threads

🔘 Get a green build

If one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green.

---

Where can I find more information?

If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:

• Overview of Review Process for Community Contributions
• Pull Request Status Guide
• Making changes to your pull request

When can I expect my changes to be merged?

Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible.

However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:

• The size and impact of the changes that it introduces
• The need for product review
• Maintenance status of the parent repository

💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (release/ulmo@7ebf349). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##             release/ulmo    #2710   +/-   ##
===============================================
  Coverage                ?   94.80%           
===============================================
  Files                   ?     1226           
  Lines                   ?    27529           
  Branches                ?     6044           
===============================================
  Hits                    ?    26098           
  Misses                  ?     1373           
  Partials                ?       58           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[diana-villalvazo-wgu]

pls fix the description with frontend PR that is being backported

[bradenmacdonald]

What's the reason for backporting this? It's a feature that's scheduled for Ulmo? Or is this fixing a bug/problem?

[dwong2708]

What's the reason for backporting this? It's a feature that's scheduled for Ulmo? Or is this fixing a bug/problem?

Hi @bradenmacdonald, these are UI improvements for the new Backup & Restore Libraries feature, which is planned for Ulmo.

The improvement is essentially adding more summary details when restoring a library from a ZIP file backup.