Skip to content

Refactor matching code #132

@j-wags

Description

@j-wags

Josh: I also have an idea for a refactor of the core matching code that I think can leverage an additional simple, ahead-of-time checkable, probably always true assumption about residue definitions to do name based matching in a single, simpler, more robust pass, and re-use code from the additional_definitions path. So would be good to talk about that at some point!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    Status

    No status

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions