Skip to content

Transform type extension mechanism #41

@avillar

Description

@avillar

Right now, any string value is accepted for a transform type.

A mechanism to define transform types (e.g., from a register) would be desirable to have.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions