You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/editing.md
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ This doesn’t mean that you’re the editor, just that you’ve been suggested
58
58
**Step 11: The editor pings the EiC team to get the paper published**
59
59
60
60
- Make a final check of the paper with `@editorialbot generate pdf` and that all references have DOIs (where appropriate) with `@editorialbot check references`.
61
-
- If everything looks good, ask the author to make a new release (if possible) of the software being reviewed and deposit a new archive the software with Zenodo/figshare. Update the review thread with this archive DOI: `@editorialbot set 10.5281/zenodo.xxxxxx as archive`.
61
+
- If everything looks good, ask the author to make a new release (if possible) of the software being reviewed and deposit a new archive of the software with Zenodo or figshare. Update the review thread with this archive DOI: `@editorialbot set 10.5281/zenodo.xxxxxx as archive`.
62
62
- Editors can get a checklist of the final steps using the `@editorialbot create post-review checklist` command
63
63
- Finally, use `@editorialbot recommend-accept` on the review thread to ping the `@openjournals/joss-eics` team letting them know the paper is ready to be accepted.
0 commit comments