Rupture Set Report: u3_ssaf_simple_rup_set
Num Ruptures
3,081
Num Single-Stranded Ruptures
3,081 (100.00%)
Magnitude Range
[5.36,8.06]
Length Range
[9.11,546.57] km
Rupture Section Count Range
[2,88]
Plausibility Configuration
(top)
(top)
u3_ssaf_simple_rup_set
Name
ClosestSectPair: maxDist=5 km
Max Jump Dist
5 km
Possible parent-section connections
Total: 18, Avg: 1.80, Range: [1,2]
Actual connections (after applying filters)
Total: 9, Avg: 1.80, Range: [1,2]
(top)
u3_ssaf_simple_rup_set
Max Allowed Splays
0
(top)
u3_ssaf_simple_rup_set
Cumulative Azimuth ≤560
Cumulative Rake Change ≤180
Jump Azimuth Change Filter
Min Sections Per Parent
Total Azimuth Change Filter
Rupture Scalar Histograms
(top)
(top)
Total length (km) of the rupture, not including jumps or gaps.
Rupture Length Extremes & Examples
(top)
Example ruptures at various percentiles of Rupture Length
Minimum: 9.11
p50: 179.59
p90: 405.83
p95: 455.64
p97.5: 487.36
p99: 512.31
p99.9: 537.45
Maximum: 546.57
(top)
Magnitude of the rupture.
Rupture Magnitude Extremes & Examples
(top)
Example ruptures at various percentiles of Rupture Magnitude
Minimum: 5.36
p50: 7.61
p90: 7.97
p95: 8.01
p97.5: 8.03
p99: 8.05
p99.9: 8.06
Maximum: 8.06
(top)
Total number of subsections involved in a rupture.
Subsection Count Extremes & Examples
(top)
Example ruptures at various percentiles of Subsection Count
Minimum: 2
p50: 28
p90: 62
p95: 70
p97.5: 76
p99: 81
p99.9: 86
Maximum: 88
(top)
Total number of clusters (of contiguous subsections on the same parent fault section) a rupture.
Cluster Count Extremes & Examples
(top)
Example ruptures at various percentiles of Cluster Count
Minimum: 1
p50: 4
p90: 8
p95: 9
p97.5: 10
p99: 10
p99.9: 10
Maximum: 10
(top)
Total area of the rupture (km^2).
(top)
Example ruptures at various percentiles of Area
Minimum: 19.52
p50: 2417.76
p90: 5508.74
p95: 6131.71
p97.5: 6432.46
p99: 6655.19
p99.9: 6825.63
Maximum: 6854.91
(top)
The maximum jump distance in the rupture.
Maximum Jump Dist Extremes & Examples
(top)
Example ruptures at various percentiles of Maximum Jump Dist
Minimum: 0.0
p50: 0.006117107
p90: 1.82
p95: 1.82
p97.5: 1.82
p99: 1.82
p99.9: 1.82
Maximum: 1.82
(top)
The total cumulative jump distance summed over all jumps in the rupture.
Cumulative Jump Dist Extremes & Examples
(top)
Example ruptures at various percentiles of Cumulative Jump Dist
Minimum: 0.0
p50: 0.011590694
p90: 1.83
p95: 1.83
p97.5: 1.83
p99: 1.83
p99.9: 1.83
Maximum: 1.83
(top)
The ratio between the total length of this rupture and the 'idealized length,' which we define as the straight line distance between the furthest two subsections.
Ideal Length Ratio Extremes & Examples
(top)
Example ruptures at various percentiles of Ideal Length Ratio
Minimum: 1
p50: 1.01
p90: 1.03
p95: 1.03
p97.5: 1.04
p99: 1.04
p99.9: 1.04
Maximum: 1.06
(top)
The difference between the total length of this rupture and the 'idealized length,' which we define as the straight line distance between the furthest two subsections.
Ideal Length Difference Extremes & Examples
(top)
Example ruptures at various percentiles of Ideal Length Difference
Minimum: -2.3869882E-4
p50: 2.07
p90: 9.75
p95: 11.06
p97.5: 12.32
p99: 13.12
p99.9: 13.81
Maximum: 14.02
(top)
The area-averaged rake for this rupture.
(top)
Cumulative rake change for this rupture.
(top)
The number of times a rupture changed mechanisms, e.g., from right-lateral SS to left-lateral or SS to reverse.
Mechanism Change Extremes & Examples
(top)
Example ruptures at various percentiles of Mechanism Change
Minimum: 0.0
p50: 0.0
p90: 0.0
p95: 0.0
p97.5: 0.0
p99: 0.0
p99.9: 0.0
Maximum: 0.0
Cumulative Azimuth Change
(top)
Cumulative azimuth change for this rupture.
Cumulative Azimuth Change Extremes & Examples
(top)
Example ruptures at various percentiles of Cumulative Azimuth Change
Minimum: 0.0
p50: 59.09
p90: 235.02
p95: 265.91
p97.5: 267.69
p99: 267.85
p99.9: 267.96
Maximum: 268
Biasi & Wesnousky (2016,2017) Prob
(top)
Biasi & Wesnousky (2016,2017) conditional probability of passing through each jump.
Biasi & Wesnousky (2016,2017) Prob Extremes & Examples
(top)
Example ruptures at various percentiles of Biasi & Wesnousky (2016,2017) Prob
Maximum: 1
p50: 0.22
p10: 0.0039505213
p5: 0.0028828129
p2.5: 0.0021036742
p1: 0.0021036742
p0.1: 0.0021036742
Minimum: 0.0021036742
(top)
The difference between the slip rate with the highest and lowest slip rate in the rupture.
Max Slip Rate Difference Extremes & Examples
(top)
Example ruptures at various percentiles of Max Slip Rate Difference
Minimum: 0.0
p50: 10
p90: 24
p95: 24
p97.5: 25
p99: 25
p99.9: 25
Maximum: 25
Fault Section Connections
(top)
Jump Counts Over Distance
(top)
Subsection Maximum Values
(top)
These plots show the maximum value of various quantities across all ruptures for which each individual subsection participates. This is useful, for example, to find sections with low maximum magnitudes (due to low or no connectivity).
Subsection Maximum Rupture Length
(top)
Subsection Maximum Rupture Magnitude
(top)
Subsection Maximum Cumulative Jump Dist
(top)
Subsection Maximum Cumulative Rake Change
(top)
Subsection Maximum Cumulative Azimuth Change
(top)