Skip to content

Conversation

serverless-qe
Copy link

Update OWNERS file

Copy link

@gauron99 gauron99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 24, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gauron99, serverless-qe

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 915a1a9 and 2 for PR HEAD a1da636 in total

14 similar comments
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 915a1a9 and 2 for PR HEAD a1da636 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 915a1a9 and 2 for PR HEAD a1da636 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 915a1a9 and 2 for PR HEAD a1da636 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 915a1a9 and 2 for PR HEAD a1da636 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 915a1a9 and 2 for PR HEAD a1da636 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 915a1a9 and 2 for PR HEAD a1da636 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 915a1a9 and 2 for PR HEAD a1da636 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 915a1a9 and 2 for PR HEAD a1da636 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 915a1a9 and 2 for PR HEAD a1da636 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 915a1a9 and 2 for PR HEAD a1da636 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 915a1a9 and 2 for PR HEAD a1da636 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 915a1a9 and 2 for PR HEAD a1da636 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 915a1a9 and 2 for PR HEAD a1da636 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 915a1a9 and 2 for PR HEAD a1da636 in total

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 31, 2025

@serverless-qe: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/419-e2e-oncluster-test a1da636 link true /test 419-e2e-oncluster-test
ci/prow/420-e2e-oncluster-test a1da636 link true /test 420-e2e-oncluster-test

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@serverless-qe serverless-qe force-pushed the sync-owners-release-v1.16 branch from a1da636 to dd103a3 Compare August 1, 2025 07:00
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm label Aug 1, 2025
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 1, 2025

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 1, 2025

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (release-v1.16@c4ea8a7). Learn more about missing BASE report.
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             release-v1.16    #1338   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage                 ?   57.03%           
================================================
  Files                    ?      129           
  Lines                    ?    15837           
  Branches                 ?        0           
================================================
  Hits                     ?     9033           
  Misses                   ?     5967           
  Partials                 ?      837           
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e-test 35.19% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-go 25.45% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-quarkus 24.90% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-rust 24.41% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-springboot 24.45% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@serverless-qe serverless-qe force-pushed the sync-owners-release-v1.16 branch from dd103a3 to f9beeac Compare August 19, 2025 16:02
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 19, 2025

There are empty aliases in OWNER_ALIASES, cleanup is advised.

@serverless-qe serverless-qe force-pushed the sync-owners-release-v1.16 branch from f9beeac to da0ffb1 Compare August 20, 2025 14:31
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 20, 2025

There are empty aliases in OWNER_ALIASES, cleanup is advised.

@serverless-qe serverless-qe force-pushed the sync-owners-release-v1.16 branch from da0ffb1 to 7404b1c Compare August 26, 2025 12:53
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 26, 2025

There are empty aliases in OWNER_ALIASES, cleanup is advised.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants