You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: apps/docs/blog/2024-07-15-impact-of-retro-funding/index.md
+3-3Lines changed: 3 additions & 3 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ Most of the analysis in this post focuses on the 315 OSS projects that participa
43
43
44
44
## Trends in Developer Activity Before/After RF3
45
45
46
-
Developer activity is a key metric for measuring the health and growth of OSS projects. Builder numbers are up across the board since RF3, especially for projects that have been in more than one round, and even when compared to a baseline group of projets that have never received RF.
46
+
Developer activity is a key metric for measuring the health and growth of OSS projects. Builder numbers are up across the board since RF3, especially for projects that have been in more than one round, and even when compared to a baseline group of projects that have never received RF.
47
47
48
48
### Methodology
49
49
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ We can perform a similar analysis against a baseline group of projects that have
91
91
92
92

93
93
94
-
We can also plot the absoluate differences in developer numbers before/after RF3 for each project in the cohort as a histogram. The distribution is a nice bell curve with a slight positive skew, indicating more projects saw a small increase (rather than decrease) in developer activity. Note that the x-axis has been truncated to focus on the majority of projects.
94
+
We can also plot the absolute differences in developer numbers before/after RF3 for each project in the cohort as a histogram. The distribution is a nice bell curve with a slight positive skew, indicating more projects saw a small increase (rather than decrease) in developer activity. Note that the x-axis has been truncated to focus on the majority of projects.
95
95
96
96

97
97
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ To do this, we take the total amount of tokens projects were granted in RF3 and
104
104
- Below 5K OP per developer (47 projects)
105
105
- 5-10K OP per developer (43 projects)
106
106
- 10-20K OP per developer (60 projects)
107
-
- Over 20K OP per developer (51 projecs)
107
+
- Over 20K OP per developer (51 projects)
108
108
109
109
We then calculate the net change in developer activity for each sub-cohort and the mean across each distribution. These results are shown in the chart below.
0 commit comments