-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
Add watcher related information gathering #114
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
openshift-merge-bot
merged 1 commit into
openstack-k8s-operators:main
from
raukadah:watcher
Nov 12, 2025
+19
−0
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ declare -a OSP_SERVICES=( | |
| "aodh" | ||
| "logging" | ||
| "instanceha" | ||
| "watcher" | ||
| ) | ||
| export OSP_SERVICES | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is not correct we shoudl not be collecting the datamodel actions, audits or action plans
the goals and stragies would only hcange if they added there own plugins for thos so the only thing i thikn we shoudl likely keep is the service list
if you look at the nova version you can see we intentiolly do not collelct the flavor or instances as we are not ment to collect the workload info via must gather
collection the action plans, actions autit templates and audits re all "workload info" in the context of watcher.
i maybe coudl see collectin the list of audittempelates but honeslty i dotn think that will be useful for debuging.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree that probably the only useful part will be the service list and maybe audits (i.e. to see the parameters for questions like "my audit X is not doing what I'd expect) although for those case it will probably easier to ask for specific commands.
We can also keep the list of goals and strategies just to check that the deployment of watcher went fine.
Said that, I'd say the only bad side of it is extra space usage, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@SeanMooney @amoralej you are correct, collecting all info does help. #116 now collects goal, strategy and services list.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the goals and stragies i think is fine
the probelm with the workload information is w eshoudl not be collecting data that might be sensivite and things liek the parmaters pass to an audit may be.
certainly i know we have to be careful with collecting ips and hostnames in general, the service list i think is ok but i think the datamodel is too far at least by default.
we could support it via a flag but i strongly suspect we would be much better off requesting this info explicit if necessary. if that happen often we can expand the list but for now lets keep this pretty simple and short.