metagraph emission is incorrect for miners in subnets with subsubnets/mechanisms.

[dougsillars]

Describe the bug

across all subnets, if you sum the emissions - they all come to be ~296 alpha... which is 82% of 360.

There are 5 subnets that report MUCH lower values

These 5 subnets have subnet mechanisms turned on.

It appears that incentive per mechanism, and overall incentive are correct - but somehow when that is being propagated to the emission - the incorrect number is being calculated.

it appears the correct values are being awarded to miners, only the value in the metagraph is incorrect

To Reproduce

find a subnet with mechansims turned on.

find a miner. manually calculate their emissions - compare to the chain.

I have a jupyter notebook I am happy to share.

Expected behavior

Emission is properly reported for all neurons.

Screenshots

No response

Environment

the chain - nov 10

Additional context

No response

[ultrashiny]

noticed that too while setting up multi-mechanisms, but didn't worry much since miners are still getting the right emissions
but yeah, having correct values everywhere definitely matters, and we agree it's important to fix that
happy to help you with your testing!
(fyi, i'm the owner of sn117 - wevve already got 2 competitions running on mainnet, with more on the way)

[open-junius]

Will investigate it.