Replies: 2 comments
-
Thanks for participating! I've combined the top results from the two surveys into this (hopefully final) survey: Please vote again there! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
We need more participation! If you voted in this survey, please add your voice to the likely final survey for the naming of both pseudo classes: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
See w3c/csswg-drafts#12515 for the source of this poll. This is a survey of naming suggestions for the second, "target", pseudo class for the interest invoker API.
There are two pseudo classes proposed for this API: both of them match when an interest invoker "has interest". The first pseudo class matches the element with the
interestfor
attribute, and the second matches the "target" of that invoker. I.e. forinterestfor=foo
, the second class matches the element withid=foo
. This survey is about the second pseudo class.32 votes ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions