How a mediation recipient does make a connection with a mediator #429
Replies: 3 comments
-
When using a public did you can use it as an implicit invitation. So I'd say the second option:
Specific reason not to use it? I'd like to add a did resolver in the near future that can use did resolvers from that library. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
It provides some nice features with regards to did url parsing and caching etc. https://github.com/decentralized-identity/did-resolver Related issue: #172 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'm not saying we shouldn't use it, just it's not necessary to have at least some improvement on the way forward. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
We started the discussion in #250, but it deserves its own issue.
It seems there is no specification of how it should work. It's a question of whether it should be part of the framework. In any case, I would like to understand how to solve it :)
I like the idea with did:web method and having
https://w3c-ccg.github.io/.well-known/did.json
on mediator server where an edge agent can find DID Document with service and keys. We don't even need to have web-did-resolver at the start.But I'm not sure how to continue from there.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions