[test] Make add-org automated more robust: interactive input

[nemesifier]

Follow up of #808 and #871.

Why config/__tests__/add-org.test.js? It's pretty different from anything else we have here.
Would just config/add-org.test.js work?

I tried commenting out a critical line like:

diff --git a/config/add-org.js b/config/add-org.js
index edfa4d1..f13c9e4 100644
--- a/config/add-org.js
+++ b/config/add-org.js
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ const createConfiguration = async (response) => {
 
 const createConfigurationWithPrompts = async () => {
   const response = await prompt(prompts);
-  createConfiguration(response);
+  // createConfiguration(response);
 };
 
 const createConfigurationWithoutPrompts = (passedData) => {

The tests passed anyway. Is this correct? Doesn't look right to me, I would expect at least one test to fail.
The last test method seems to test prompts but doesn't check the result, I would at least check that given a series of prompts the result matches what we expect from the prompts.

[ProblemShooter]

🎯 Plan to Improve Test Robustness

Visual Workflow

---

📊 Comparison Table

Aspect	Current Method	Proposed Method
Input Validation	Basic prompt testing	Full interactive input validation
Output Matching	Not checked	Result matches expected config
Test Coverage	Limited to prompt	Expanded: input & output integration
Reliability	Critical changes may pass undetected	Critical changes break tests as intended

---

✅ Proposed Approach

• Refactor the current add-org test to validate both input prompts and the resulting configuration
• Use mock data and interactive scenarios to ensure output matches input
• Update the last test method to cover input/output together
• Ensure that commenting out critical lines (like createConfiguration(response)) causes tests to fail

---

💻 Code Snippet Example

// Example: validating config output from interactive input
const expectedConfig = { orgName: 'Testorg', ... };
const result = await runInteractiveAddOrg(testPrompts);
expect(result).toEqual(expectedConfig);

---

Maintainers: Kindly assign this issue to me so I can proceed with implementing these improvements! 🙏