Skip to content

Conversation

@ogenstad
Copy link
Contributor

This is to consolidate how we load modules and will be used as a preparation for #81.

This is to consolidate how we load modules and will be used as a
preparation for #81.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 30, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 80.00000% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
infrahub_sdk/checks.py 80.00% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           develop     #115       +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage    43.26%   64.29%   +21.03%     
============================================
  Files           74       74               
  Lines         6856     6864        +8     
  Branches      1353     1358        +5     
============================================
+ Hits          2966     4413     +1447     
+ Misses        3622     2099     -1523     
- Partials       268      352       +84     
Flag Coverage Δ
python-3.10 43.24% <30.00%> (-0.03%) ⬇️
python-3.11 43.24% <30.00%> (-0.03%) ⬇️
python-3.12 43.24% <30.00%> (-0.03%) ⬇️
python-3.9 43.18% <30.00%> (-0.03%) ⬇️
python-filler-3.12 23.92% <50.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
infrahub_sdk/checks.py 63.39% <80.00%> (+35.50%) ⬆️

... and 39 files with indirect coverage changes

@ogenstad ogenstad marked this pull request as ready for review October 30, 2024 10:43
@ogenstad ogenstad requested a review from a team October 30, 2024 10:43
@ogenstad ogenstad merged commit 2e04802 into develop Oct 30, 2024
12 checks passed
@ogenstad ogenstad deleted the pog-add-client-to-check branch October 30, 2024 11:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants