Skip to content

Conversation

@wvandeun
Copy link
Contributor

@wvandeun wvandeun commented Jul 28, 2025

Adds support for NumberPool attributes to generated protocols.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added support for NumberPool attributes in protocol generation, enabling handling of NumberPool-related data.

@wvandeun wvandeun self-assigned this Jul 28, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 28, 2025

Walkthrough

Support for NumberPool attributes has been added to the protocol generation process. This is achieved by updating the attribute kind mapping to recognize "NumberPool" as an "Integer" type, enabling proper handling of NumberPool-related data in generated protocols.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Changelog Update
changelog/+add_numberpool_support_protocols.added.md
Added a changelog entry documenting the introduction of NumberPool attribute support in protocols.
Attribute Kind Mapping
infrahub_sdk/protocols_generator/constants.py
Added "NumberPool": "Integer" to the ATTRIBUTE_KIND_MAP dictionary for protocol generation.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch wvd-20250728-add-numberpool-support-to-protocols

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary or Summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@cloudflare-workers-and-pages
Copy link

Deploying infrahub-sdk-python with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: 936522d
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://d5d09c53.infrahub-sdk-python.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://wvd-20250728-add-numberpool.infrahub-sdk-python.pages.dev

View logs

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 28, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (16da1ba) and HEAD (936522d). Click for more details.

HEAD has 6 uploads less than BASE
Flag BASE (16da1ba) HEAD (936522d)
python-3.12 2 1
python-3.10 1 0
python-filler-3.12 2 0
python-3.13 2 1
integration-tests 2 1
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           stable     #484       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   75.76%   53.79%   -21.97%     
===========================================
  Files         100      100               
  Lines        8838     8789       -49     
  Branches     1733     1719       -14     
===========================================
- Hits         6696     4728     -1968     
- Misses       1666     3688     +2022     
+ Partials      476      373      -103     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration-tests 34.85% <ø> (-0.06%) ⬇️
python-3.10 ?
python-3.11 47.94% <ø> (?)
python-3.12 47.92% <ø> (-0.27%) ⬇️
python-3.13 47.94% <ø> (-0.25%) ⬇️
python-3.9 46.63% <ø> (-0.03%) ⬇️
python-filler-3.12 ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
infrahub_sdk/protocols_generator/constants.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)

... and 61 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
infrahub_sdk/protocols_generator/constants.py (1)

3-26: Add unit test for the new NumberPool mapping
I’ve verified via rg that:

  • ATTRIBUTE_KIND_MAP includes "NumberPool": "Integer" (constants.py)
  • The schema enum (infrahub_sdk/schema/main.py) and protocols (infrahub_sdk/protocols.py) define and handle CoreNumberPool
  • Fixtures already include a NumberPool entry (tests/fixtures/schema_05.json)

However, there’s no generator test asserting that a NumberPool attribute produces a Python int. Please add/extend a unit test to cover this:

• In your protocols‐generator tests (e.g. under tests/test_protocols_generator/), load or craft a minimal schema containing a NumberPool attribute.
• Run the codegen and assert that the resulting protocol class uses int for that field.
• Optional: add a simple constant‐mapping assertion, e.g.

from infrahub_sdk.protocols_generator.constants import ATTRIBUTE_KIND_MAP
assert ATTRIBUTE_KIND_MAP["NumberPool"] == "Integer"

This will ensure full coverage of the new attribute kind.

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
infrahub_sdk/protocols_generator/constants.py (1)

25-25: Keep ATTRIBUTE_KIND_MAP alphabetically sorted for readability & easier diffing

The new entry is appended at the bottom. Consider inserting it in alphabetical order (between "Number" and "Password") to maintain the existing ordering convention and reduce merge-conflict likelihood.

-    "NumberPool": "Integer",
+    "NumberPool": "Integer",  # <- place alphabetically between "Number" and "Password"
changelog/+add_numberpool_support_protocols.added.md (1)

1-1: Changelog entry: capitalise sentence & include context section

Follow the repo’s changelog pattern (imperative, capitalised, possibly under a heading like “Added”). Example:

-add support for NumberPool attributes in generated protocols
+Added: support for NumberPool attributes in generated protocols
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 16da1ba and 936522d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • changelog/+add_numberpool_support_protocols.added.md (1 hunks)
  • infrahub_sdk/protocols_generator/constants.py (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (6)
  • GitHub Check: unit-tests (3.11)
  • GitHub Check: unit-tests (3.12)
  • GitHub Check: integration-tests-latest-infrahub
  • GitHub Check: unit-tests (3.10)
  • GitHub Check: unit-tests (3.13)
  • GitHub Check: unit-tests (3.9)

@BeArchiTek BeArchiTek merged commit f3bb071 into stable Jul 29, 2025
20 checks passed
@BeArchiTek BeArchiTek deleted the wvd-20250728-add-numberpool-support-to-protocols branch July 29, 2025 10:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants