Convert import paths to use relative Package name

[dgarros]

Related to opsmill/infrahub#4234

In order to use a different package name within Infrahub, we need to convert the internal hardcoded import paths into relative paths.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 57.47126% with 74 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
infrahub_sdk/client.py	0.00%	18 Missing ⚠️
infrahub_sdk/__init__.py	0.00%	12 Missing ⚠️
infrahub_sdk/node.py	0.00%	6 Missing ⚠️
infrahub_sdk/config.py	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️
infrahub_sdk/schema.py	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️
infrahub_sdk/branch.py	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
infrahub_sdk/query_groups.py	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
infrahub_sdk/checks.py	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
infrahub_sdk/playback.py	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
infrahub_sdk/pytest_plugin/plugin.py	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
... and 16 more

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop      #80   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    43.28%   43.28%           
========================================
  Files           74       74           
  Lines         6847     6847           
  Branches      1353     1353           
========================================
  Hits          2964     2964           
- Misses        3552     3614   +62     
+ Partials       331      269   -62     

Flag	Coverage Δ
python-3.10	43.28% <57.47%> (ø)
python-3.11	43.28% <57.47%> (ø)
python-3.12	43.28% <57.47%> (ø)
python-3.9	43.23% <57.47%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
infrahub_sdk/code_generator.py	25.39% <100.00%> (ø)
infrahub_sdk/ctl/branch.py	76.81% <100.00%> (ø)
infrahub_sdk/ctl/check.py	27.00% <100.00%> (ø)
infrahub_sdk/ctl/cli_commands.py	37.05% <100.00%> (ø)
infrahub_sdk/ctl/client.py	47.61% <100.00%> (ø)
infrahub_sdk/ctl/exporter.py	52.17% <100.00%> (ø)
infrahub_sdk/ctl/generator.py	21.56% <100.00%> (ø)
infrahub_sdk/ctl/importer.py	55.00% <100.00%> (ø)
infrahub_sdk/ctl/menu.py	65.38% <100.00%> (ø)
infrahub_sdk/ctl/object.py	65.38% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 40 more

[ogenstad]

I think we might run into issues with this:

https://github.com/opsmill/infrahub-sdk-python/blob/develop/infrahub_sdk/schema.py#L111-L112

When we import the generators from the Git Agent and run this check on the imported objects we're probably going to get a mismatch. I still think we can move forward with this PR, but potentially we'll need to switch to using a protocol definition instead of pointing to the expected base class.

[dgarros]

I think we might run into issues with this:

https://github.com/opsmill/infrahub-sdk-python/blob/develop/infrahub_sdk/schema.py#L111-L112

When we import the generators from the Git Agent and run this check on the imported objects we're probably going to get a mismatch. I still think we can move forward with this PR, but potentially we'll need to switch to using a protocol definition instead of pointing to the expected base class.

This is a good point, I'll check that