Domain management with TestShell 4.8 SP3 #468
Quali-Community
started this conversation in
Useful Tips & Guides
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
General
About domains management in TestShell 4.8 SP3
The definition of a domain.
For many customers the term domain (regardless of TestShell) represents a silo of equipment.
For example, at a service provider: The Cisco Domain would contain all the Cisco equipment.
In some cases the silo definition doesn't work well with TestShell and may generate management overhead for the admin.
The domain in TestShell is more oriented towards the test-bed silo.
A Cisco test-bed would include Cisco equipment, Traffic equipment, L1 ports and some equipment by other vendors (if interoperability testing is conducted)
It's important to note that, in TestShell, the same equipment will and can appear in multiple domains where reserving the equipment defines and protects the user who is using the equipment at that time.
Introducing the project domain concept.
In TestShell 4.8 SP3 we've added the ability to define domains which enable view-only rights to users and domains which allow the users to actually reserve the equipment. These capabilities are combined with a change where the user will see all the devices from all view-only domains regardless of the domain he logs in to. As long as the domain was associated to his user group.
With these capabilities the admin has an additional allocation control layer he can use to manage the devices in TestShell.
Some examples:
associates the domain to the specific user group,
and sets the association so that the "view-only" is not checked
associates the domains to the user groups without the view-only selected
When should project domains be used.
If a team is going to work on a testing cycle with a test-bed for the next 3 to 6 months, the admin should build a project domain for it.
The team can then coordinate internally and interact with their equipment via reservations.
Many ex-Gale users are used to have a reservation for the project level. This reservation was shared and they would need to coordinate manually.
The project level domain is equivalent to this project level reservation, only we provide the additional level of reservations under them.
Introducing this approach may reduce the requirement for sharing topologies, although there are additional use cases that aren't solved by the flow described.
(Quali) - 05/14/2013 06:41 AM
· 2851 ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions