Unacceptable authentication practices #101
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
|
I absolutely agree. This is incredibly frustrating. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thanks for raising this concern – I understand the frustration around authentication requirements for CI/CD pipelines. I'd like to clarify a few points that might help: The DHI images are free to use. There's no cost associated with pulling or using the images themselves in your environments. You have several options for accessing them if you can't use a PAT:
We're also actively working on OIDC support, which will provide additional authentication options for automated workflows in the future. I hope one of these options works for your setup. If you have questions about mirroring or building from source, please let me know! cd |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I was quite excited when it was announced that DHI now would be free, but that excitement quickly turned into disappointment and huge frustration.
It is essentially unusable in a professional setting. Having personal access tokens in a company CI/CD pipeline is a potential security risk and not acceptable. The only way of obtaining a non-personal token is through a Docker Team subscription, which isn't free. This is immensely disappointing, because something like DHI is exactly what I am looking for.
In the announcement it is claimed that "DHI now gives the world a secure, minimal, production-ready foundation from the very first pull", but if you cannot obtain the images in any other way than using a personal access token, it is most definitely not production ready.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions