Replies: 2 comments
-
|
Hey @iacchus, thanks for the insights. Yeah, I am aware that the CSS customization is still very limited and hard to accomplish without resorting to |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Hey @iacchus, I tried to improve the customizability in #158. I hope that helps! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I've spent the last few hours tinkering with the Giscus css and had some insights:
I think if giscus had a mode with the (1.) css framework stripped off which had a (2.) simple skelenton html all namespaced with the
.gsc-classes and (3.) with a simple base css, I think would encourage people to develop different and beautiful templates with more freedom, only by editing the css.Maybe with a default
.gsc-classes and something like empty.gsc-custom-classes with preemptiness in the markup, so that them would override the default ones?For example I am having to add some selectors to edit some things (like
div:nth-child(2)), to unset framework classes, to add some css's!importantoverrides etc.Maybe then we could make a portifolio repository of different themes with images at
github.ioso that people could choose from.These are some suggestions that happened in my mind :), thanks for the software!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions