Replies: 1 comment
-
|
@kmnhan Can you just call your model function directly? I suppose I am somewhat sympathetic, and we do try to allow "array-like" data on input, but So, I guess I am a "maybe" on this... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello,
Although array coercing has a much more consistent behavior with the 1.2.2 update, it happens to break some of my existing code that relies on
xarray's broadcasting.For instance, when I have a
ModelResultfrom a fit, I used to do something likeresult.eval(x=arr)wherearris axarray.DataArray.This would return a
xarray.DataArraywhich retains the coordinates and attributes ofarr. Now, the output is coerced into a numpy array.Hence it would be great if the coercion for
evalcould be toggled off, for instance with a keyword argument, whereresult.eval(x=arr, coerce_farray=False)would have the old behavior. This would also mean more consistency withModel.fit.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions