Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Here are some numbers comparing s3 storage costs: https://github.com/Mic92/niks3/wiki/S3-Provider-Comparison You may wonder, why niks3 over attic. Well with attic it more work to make it high-available i.e. using some load-balancer and postgres cluster. Meanwhile s3 providers already solved the scaling issue. With many people potentially depending on this cache having a single server for the binary cache seems bit risky. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Looks like niks3 soon gets a OIDC support: Mic92/niks3#135
This would actually help with security over using the nix-community cachix cache,
because it would remove the long-living tokens from our github CI.
Also we could potentially make our binary cache bigger if needed and we want to throw more money on it.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions