Quarto makes it difficult to get PDF and HTML outputs with consistent formatting, and other limitations for manuscripts #14115
a-dna-n
started this conversation in
Feature Requests
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Important Accessibility: To improve accessibility, please add alternative text to your screenshots. This helps all users, including those using screen readers, to understand the context of the images. A brief description can make a big difference! See Good Alt Text, Bad Alt Text — Making Your Content Perceivable. Important Accessibility: For better accessibility, please ensure link text is descriptive and meaningful rather than using generic terms such as "here". This helps all users understand the link's destination. See Writing meaningful link text (WCAG). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello.
Quarto has some limitations that were difficult to pick up in the first place and time-consuming to figure out. For the sake of other people considering Quarto for a manuscript, I think it would be good to revise the documentation and e.g. link any preview to a specific output format.
For the record, Markdown tables have annoying limitations (headers and data justified separately, adjustable row height, etc.) so I read this and thought it would be fine to add formatting in HTML/css:
I suppose I read too much into that. Please correct me if I'm mistaken, but here's what I experienced:
The translation of the CSS means your table in Typst should look similar to how it looks in HTML without any intervention on your part.The example that follows consists of these two tables. They're in separate tabs so they can't be seen at the same time.
Thanks.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions