Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

I've independently verified this test using Claude and pikepdf. The PDF has two /Formula structure elements, each with:

  • An /AF (Associated File) array containing MathML as application/mathml+xml with /AFRelationship /Supplement — this is the correct UA-2 mechanism
  • The actual MathML content is well-formed (e.g., <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mi>𝐸</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mi>𝑚</mi> <msup> <mi>𝑐</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </math>)
  • TeX source is also attached as a second AF with /AFRelationship /Source

However, there is no /Alt or /ActualText on the Formula elements. This is by design — UA-2 uses the embedded MathML AF as the accessible representation instead of alt text.

So this …

Replies: 2 comments 9 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
5 replies
@paciorek
Comment options

@mcanouil
Comment options

@mcanouil
Comment options

@paciorek
Comment options

@mcanouil
Comment options

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
4 replies
@paciorek
Comment options

@gordonwoodhull
Comment options

Answer selected by paciorek
@mcanouil
Comment options

@paciorek
Comment options

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
accessibility latex LaTeX engines related libraries and technologies
3 participants