Does the storage object also rely on the file system like Minio?

[nizq]

In our application, limited by the file system, Minio's performance in processing massive small files (especially list operations) is very poor.

在我们的应用中，受制于文件系统，Minio对于海量小文件的处理（尤其是list操作）性能非常差。

[snakeliwei]

It must be related to the underlying file system. To put it bluntly, it is also the upper-level application.

肯定是和底层用啥文件系统有关啊，说白了也是上层应用

[nizq]

It must be related to the underlying file system. To put it bluntly, it is also the upper-level application.

肯定是和底层用啥文件系统有关啊，说白了也是上层应用

Minio把每个小对象都保存为一个文件系统的文件，由于操作系统打开文件描述符个数的限制，list操作会非常慢。而seaweedfs后端采用rocksdb，不受文件系统的限制，在小对象处理方面感觉丝滑的多。

[loverustfs]

As far as I know, the open source version of MinIO has been widely used for several years. Some large customers have already exceeded 1 exabyte of storage.

MinIO's AIStore and the open source version share the same underlying architecture.

RustFS approach is exactly the same as MinIO's.

So, I believe the issue isn't with the file system. Rather, it's that you're using it incorrectly.