docs: Pin go sdk version to 2.2.1 since there is not a 2.3.0 version released. #2087
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
sethtomy
changed the title
|
Hey @sethtomy thanks a lot! I agree that getting the new version out would be the preferred option... you can maybe find some pointers here: https://github.com/ory/sdk - personally I also have never done it and most of the dev staff is already in the weekend. I will see to get some eyes on this after the weekend., |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
DOCUMENTATION: Pin go sdk version to 2.2.1 since there is not a 2.3.0 version released.
Related Issue or Design Document
Checklist
If this pull request addresses a security vulnerability,
I confirm that I got approval (please contact [email protected]) from the maintainers to push the changes.
Further comments
I ran into this when using the documentation to use the go sdk.
If it's preferred to regenerate and publish the client (I'm sure it is), a small pointer in the right direction I'm happy to do that instead.