Skip to content

Maybe rework subcommands for silo- and fleet-scoped timeseries #963

@david-crespo

Description

@david-crespo

See fc95ef8

I noticed this while bumping the CLI in the v12 docs PR: the timeseries command hierarchy is a little confusing. It's all under experimental (which makes it less bad and we can probably punt for a while) but we're reproducing the system/developer distinction inside of experimental.

image

I think it's tolerable, but it's worth mulling over. Presumably these commands will eventually stop being experimental. In that case we have oxide timeseries (silo-scoped) and oxide system timeseries (fleet-scoped). That matches the API routes, but it's not really how we handle fleet-scoped stuff in the CLI. For example, silo stuff is all admin-oriented but it lives under oxide silo.

Image

I'm thinking oxide timeseries is the top-level thing, and then we distinguish system vs. not inside there? It's still a little dicey, e.g., is it oxide timeseries system query vs. oxide timeseries query?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions