Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Would the checksum qualifier satisfy this? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hashes are one of the common ways in which content blobs are identified. In most of the spec, there is a way of which this is encoded, either via a string like "sha256:..." or a json that looks like
{"alg":"sha256", "value":"..."}
. This requires understanding the spec for each data format that wants to express a content hash of a blob.Wondering if we can create a consistent way to define and consume this through a PURL. Maybe something like:
or some variation using parameters (not super fluent in what the best way to encode this is!)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions