As discussed during the PaNET meetings, we want to move the 'defined by experimental probe' class directly under owl:Thing, rather than leave it under 'photon and neutron technique'.
The idea is that classes that are solely subclasses of 'defined by experimental probe' will no longer be classified as techniques, while classes that are also subclasses of the other three top-level classes (e.g. 'defined by experimental physical process') will remain under 'photon and neutron technique'.
I have attempted this change to check if it will break anything. As far as I can tell, the taxonomy still holds.
Here is the modified csv file:
PaNET.csv
I also used the ROBOT diff function to check the changes:
compare.txt
The only change in subclass relationships is that 'defined by experimental probe' class is now directly under owl:Thing instead of 'photon and neutron technique', which is what we wanted.
As discussed during the PaNET meetings, we want to move the 'defined by experimental probe' class directly under owl:Thing, rather than leave it under 'photon and neutron technique'.
The idea is that classes that are solely subclasses of 'defined by experimental probe' will no longer be classified as techniques, while classes that are also subclasses of the other three top-level classes (e.g. 'defined by experimental physical process') will remain under 'photon and neutron technique'.
I have attempted this change to check if it will break anything. As far as I can tell, the taxonomy still holds.
Here is the modified csv file:
PaNET.csv
I also used the ROBOT diff function to check the changes:
compare.txt
The only change in subclass relationships is that 'defined by experimental probe' class is now directly under owl:Thing instead of 'photon and neutron technique', which is what we wanted.