Skip to content

Conversation

WillAyd
Copy link
Member

@WillAyd WillAyd commented Jan 22, 2024

I think this was @rhshadrach idea originally. This currently generates about 3k lines of SKIPs in the CI output, which can be mildly annoying to have to scroll through every log

@WillAyd WillAyd requested a review from mroeschke as a code owner January 22, 2024 17:49
Copy link
Member

@rhshadrach rhshadrach left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@lithomas1 pointed out you can just search for "failure" in the log and it jumps to the line I want. This works well and I've been doing it ever since. Still, if we think no one finds this generally useful (and I imagine that's the case), definitely very positive here.

@lithomas1
Copy link
Contributor

+1 on this - sometimes the large amount of output does make my logs lag.

@lukemanley
Copy link
Member

+1 as well

@mroeschke mroeschke added the CI Continuous Integration label Jan 22, 2024
@mroeschke mroeschke added this to the 2.2.1 milestone Jan 22, 2024
Copy link
Member

@mroeschke mroeschke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It was useful for me on occasion when investigating fixable skips, but I can do that manually once in a while

@mroeschke mroeschke merged commit b29e293 into pandas-dev:main Jan 22, 2024
@mroeschke
Copy link
Member

Thanks @WillAyd

meeseeksmachine pushed a commit to meeseeksmachine/pandas that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2024
mroeschke pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2024
…#57020)

Backport PR #57011: Remove SKIP summary from CI logs

Co-authored-by: William Ayd <[email protected]>
pmhatre1 pushed a commit to pmhatre1/pandas-pmhatre1 that referenced this pull request May 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CI Continuous Integration

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants