Request for qoolqit requirements flexibility (Forschungszentrum Jülich)

[AlvaroHuanay]

Dear Pasqal team,

We are trying to add your extension qoolqit v0.3.3 (latest). Nonetheless, it has some constraints that do not allow us to add it to our stack. We have problems with:

1. "pulser[torch]~=1.6.3", -> We use pulser 1.6.2
2. "networkx~=3.4", -> We use networkx 3.5

Therefore, our stack (already in production) is incompatible with these two libraries. In case additional information is required from our side, we are currently using:

name	version
hatchling	1.27.0
poetry	2.1.3
pybind11	3.0.0
CMake	4.0.3
Python	3.13
numpy	2.3.2
SciPy	1.16.1
matplotlib	3.10.5
Qutip	5.2.1
pydantic	2.11.9
sympy	1.14.0
networkx	3.5
PyTorch	2.9.1
pyjwt	2.10.1
backoff	2.2.1
requests-mock	1.12.1
pulser_core	1.6.2
auth0-python	3.24.1
pulser_simulation	1.6.2
pasqal_cloud	0.20.5
pulser_pasqal	0.20.5
emulators	2.4.0
pulser	1.6.2

Would it be possible to request a new release for this library?

Thank you very much in advance.

[sgrava]

Hi @AlvaroHuanay,
Thanks for opening the issue. Indeed, we need to sync a bit on deps. I'll let you know soon.
Do you foresee any issue in updating your Pulser version?

[AlvaroHuanay]

Hi @sgrava,

Thanks for your quick answer! Unfortunately we cannot migrate Pulser to > 1.6.2 since Pulser is already in production in our systems and our stack is sync with many other software libraries, e.g., MyQLM (in production as well). I checked your commit d2e6e688852e3f211fcb315fa98a5a16026607ef and this fits perfectly for us.

If these two libraries are a priority to use right now, we need these flexibility requirements, otherwhise we will add them for the next breaking changes of Pulser's stack.

I really appreciate your quick action. Wishing you a nice day.

Regards.

[sgrava]

Hi @AlvaroHuanay latest release of qoolqit 0.3.4 should be good for you now! Please, let us know.