Replies: 2 comments 7 replies
-
Hey @chaoky — good catch! This is actually working as intended because your field has If you do not have Does this make sense? I am going to convert this into a discussion as I don't think there's much we can do here. Let me know what you think. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
-
another possible issue is {
slug: "landing",
fields: [
{
name: "cards",
type: "blocks",
blocks: [cards],
required: true,
},
],
} outputting
instead of
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Bug Report
required fields not being represented properly in the graphql schema
Expected Behavior
Current Behavior
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions