Update uriparser to version 0.9.9

[kocsismate]

No description provided.

[TimWolla]

You are not updating src/UriConfig.h, thus a wrong version number will be reported. Please review #19678 first.

[kocsismate]

You are not updating src/UriConfig.h, thus a wrong version number will be reported. Please review #19678 first.

Ah... I had the impression that you are going to remove this file 🤔 But let me have a look at it

[TimWolla]

Ah... I had the impression that you are going to remove this file 🤔

You can now remove it as part of this PR after a rebase for a clean upgrade.

[TimWolla]

I have verified the changes in this PR against a fresh clone of the upstream repository. The C and H files are in sync, but I'm noticing that you did not update the COPYING files.

Both src/ and include/ now have dedicated COPYING files. The one directly in ext/uri/uriparser should be removed and replaced by the COPYING.BSD-3-Clause.

[kocsismate]

Yes, I noticed it as well, but does it matter? I mean, what is the difference between the two options?

P.S. We'll need the UriConfig file

[TimWolla]

Ah and CI fails, because the UriConfig.h was actually required by the code itself.

[TimWolla]

Yes, I noticed it as well, but does it matter? I mean, what is the difference between the two options?

I consider it important to replicate the upstream repository as close as possible to make updates easier (e.g. just replacing the entire include/ and src/ directories). Also for licensing it would try to very closely follow upstream, so that we do not accidentally get out of sync and claim incorrect information.

[TimWolla]

The one directly in ext/uri/uriparser should be removed and replaced by the COPYING.BSD-3-Clause.

Please also this one: https://github.com/uriparser/uriparser/blob/master/COPYING.BSD-3-Clause for completeness. The other two in the top directory do not matter, since they are for tests and fuzzing code.