ubiquity Feature

[rrreza]

ubiquity is very good framework. but not famous because:
1- The name "Ubiquity" is Not Unique and cute name.
2- The document and guide of it is not enough. we need Video in YouTube and more article.

.

[jcheron]

Hi @rrreza
I fully agree with these 2 points.
Ubiquity is a very bad name for the reasons you gave.
I think it is never too late to rename it, especially since it is not yet well known. You are free to make proposals.

Concerning documentation and articles, I am working on it. But time is not extensible.
It is certainly wrong for me to focus on developing new features, rather than documenting existing ones.
In this case too, all contributions are welcome, even if they are minimal:

• some lines of documentation
• some code examples in a demo application
• Opening an issue to report a problem or ask a question as you just did.

It is also a good thing to contribute from the outside:
You can ask your questions on stackoverflow and php communities.
A framework without a community remains an unknown framework and can never be a good framework.

[zilveer]

Why not change framework name to something like Leopard or Jaguar, since Ubiquity's uniqueness is it's speed I think one of the names Jaguar or Leopard would fit here very good !

I vote for Jaguar!

Regards Zilveer

[jcheron]

You're not good in zoology @zilveer .
it's the fastest cheetah -> Cheetah Framework ?
And Jaguar is already taken by the english cars.

Otherwise, the ostrich is fast too.
How about Ostrich Framework?

[zilveer]

@jcheron actually Jaguar is easier to remember or else I do know that Cheetah is the fastest hence my suggestion.

But does it matter if it is taken by a car model ?

Ostrich, the name is hard to spell and hard to remember . I will come with some more suggestions later today :)

Regards

[jcheron]

It was humor, I know you know that.
Besides, I don't know why the Cheetah has a rather ridiculous name in English, maybe it's because we gave his name to Tarzan's monkey. In French, it's more stylish: Guépard.

More seriously, I (badly) chose Ubiquity because given its efficiency (ease of use en performances), the framework allows the developer to focus on the business aspect more than on the technique, which gives him the power to be everywhere.
I would have liked to change (to avoid using something not unique), but in the same spirit.

I was thinking of a contraction of Ubiquity: Uby
In France, it is a wine estate, and Uby makes very good Armagnacs
;-)
But that's another thing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UBY :-(

It is also to avoid losing the small audience that the framework has been able to acquire.

[zilveer]

@jcheron yes, and in Swedish it is called Geopard :)

But honestly Cheetah wasn't a bad name either , so perhaps changing the name to Cheetah ?

Uby is short yes but it doesn't sound good :/

Regards

[jcheron]

Except that Cheetah, in addition to being a big cat who runs fast, is also a fairly well known Python template engine...

Uby sounds good in French, it is also the cry of the female marsupilami.
But if you tell me it doesn't sound good internationally, it's better to avoid it.

I think we're going to have to dig deeper.

[zilveer]

Oh didn't think about that it was a python template engine.

Yeah we will need more suggestions, we can have Uby in one of them ;)

[Tiippex]

I think Uby is to close to Ruby

[jcheron]

And in more, an amputated Ruby :(

[zilveer]

What about Melinda Framework, I cannot see it being used anywhere in programming languages ?
It is simple to spell and not that long either ?

[jcheron]

It's not very well known, but it's still taken: Melinda Framework
Do you know a Melinda who runs fast, @zilveer ?