Skip to content

AGPL output #9

@qgevans7

Description

@qgevans7

Is it intentional for the output to be AGPL-branded?

I would happily preserve the Copyright message and mention you in credits if anyone were to use my software, and I'm happy to use and contribute to AGPL software, but as it sits legally, having that notice at the top means that any program that uses any of the output of your program is required to also be AGPL or GPLv3. That's not usually the case for utility programs, usually the output can be used freely, but because of the wording of the copyright notice this utility outputs, I have to reinvent the wheel and find a different way to do this conversion than using your (lovely) utility because I usually publish under BSD license :<

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions