Skip to content

Conversation

@piyush-jaiswal
Copy link
Owner

@piyush-jaiswal piyush-jaiswal commented Nov 7, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Enhanced validation of pagination cursor behavior for product listing endpoints, ensuring prev and next are set correctly on first and subsequent pages.
    • Extended the same cursor assertions to category and subcategory product listings; no changes to production behavior.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 7, 2025

Walkthrough

Tests were extended to assert pagination cursor properties for product and relationship endpoints, verifying cursor.prev is None on initial pages and cursor.next is None on final pages, with the inverse on subsequent pages.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Product pagination tests
tests/test_product.py
Added assertions that validate cursor.prev and cursor.next values for page 1 and page 2 of /products responses (initial page prev is None, final page next is None, counterpart is a string).
Relationship pagination tests
tests/test_relationships.py
Added identical cursor assertions for /categories/{id}/products and /subcategories/{id}/products responses across page 1 and page 2, preserving existing product count and ID checks.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes

  • Homogeneous assertion additions in tests only
  • No production code changes
  • Review focus: test correctness and clarity of cursor assertions

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 I hopped through pages, tail a-twitch,
Checking prev and next without a hitch.
Boundaries clear, cursors in sight,
Tests now dance through day and night.
🍃🧡

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The pull request title 'add next prev pagination tests' accurately reflects the main change: adding assertions for pagination cursor properties (next and prev) in test files.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feature/tests/improve-pagination-tests

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 769bb7f and 10ed26a.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • tests/test_product.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/test_relationships.py (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • tests/test_product.py
  • tests/test_relationships.py

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 7, 2025

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
tests/test_product.py (2)

223-224: Consider using isinstance() for type checking.

The assertions correctly validate the cursor structure for the first page. However, prefer isinstance(x, str) over type(x) is str for idiomatic Python type checking.

Apply this diff:

-        assert data1["cursor"]["prev"] is None
-        assert type(data1["cursor"]["next"]) is str
+        assert data1["cursor"]["prev"] is None
+        assert isinstance(data1["cursor"]["next"], str)

233-234: Consider using isinstance() for type checking.

The assertions correctly validate the cursor structure for the last page. However, prefer isinstance(x, str) over type(x) is str for idiomatic Python type checking.

Apply this diff:

-        assert data2["cursor"]["next"] is None
-        assert type(data2["cursor"]["prev"]) is str
+        assert data2["cursor"]["next"] is None
+        assert isinstance(data2["cursor"]["prev"], str)
tests/test_relationships.py (2)

222-223: Consider using isinstance() for type checking.

The cursor assertions correctly validate pagination structure for both pages. However, prefer isinstance(x, str) over type(x) is str for idiomatic Python type checking.

Apply this diff:

-        assert page1["cursor"]["prev"] is None
-        assert type(page1["cursor"]["next"]) is str
+        assert page1["cursor"]["prev"] is None
+        assert isinstance(page1["cursor"]["next"], str)

         next_cursor = page1["cursor"]["next"]
         page2 = self.client.get(f"/categories/{category['id']}/products?cursor={next_cursor}").get_json()
-        assert page2["cursor"]["next"] is None
-        assert type(page2["cursor"]["prev"]) is str
+        assert page2["cursor"]["next"] is None
+        assert isinstance(page2["cursor"]["prev"], str)

Also applies to: 227-228


262-263: Consider using isinstance() for type checking.

The cursor assertions correctly validate pagination structure for both pages. However, prefer isinstance(x, str) over type(x) is str for idiomatic Python type checking.

Apply this diff:

-        assert page1["cursor"]["prev"] is None
-        assert type(page1["cursor"]["next"]) is str
+        assert page1["cursor"]["prev"] is None
+        assert isinstance(page1["cursor"]["next"], str)

         next_cursor = page1["cursor"]["next"]
         page2 = self.client.get(f"/subcategories/{subcategory['id']}/products?cursor={next_cursor}").get_json()
-        assert page2["cursor"]["next"] is None
-        assert type(page2["cursor"]["prev"]) is str
+        assert page2["cursor"]["next"] is None
+        assert isinstance(page2["cursor"]["prev"], str)

Also applies to: 267-268

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between efce7fc and 769bb7f.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • tests/test_product.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/test_relationships.py (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
tests/test_relationships.py (1)
tests/conftest.py (1)
  • client (26-27)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: deploy-preview

@piyush-jaiswal piyush-jaiswal merged commit 60551d7 into master Nov 7, 2025
3 checks passed
@piyush-jaiswal piyush-jaiswal deleted the feature/tests/improve-pagination-tests branch November 7, 2025 06:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants